patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hultgren Defends Vote Against Fiscal Cliff Measure

Bill clears Congress, heads off crisis with expiration of Bush, Obama tax cuts, plus new taxes.

 

Congressional action late Tuesday night ended months of the nation teetering on the edge of the so-called fiscal cliff, a significant tax increase set to begin Jan. 1 with the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and temporary tax cuts put through by President Barack Obama, as well as new taxes and automatic spending cuts.

Many feared that had Congress failed to address the issue, the tax increases and automatic spending cuts would have pushed the nation once again headlong into recession. Politico reported that the bipartisan solution was approved in a 257-257 cote by the U.S. House. U.S. Rep. Randy Hultgren, R-14th District, was one of those voting against the measure.

“The lack of spending cuts in this package is indefensible, which is why I voted against it,” Hultgren said in a release issued late Tuesday. “Washington, D.C. has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. This package fails to address that. In fact, it makes the $16 trillion debt and trillion-dollar deficit even worse.”

The measure “addresses several significant issues, including tax rates for families. It repeals the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act. It includes an extension of parity for employer-provided transit benefits, which is something I’ve fought for repeatedly,” he said in the release. “Most importantly, it makes current tax rates permanent for individuals earning less than $400,000 and families earning less than $450,000. That must happen, but not in the absence of any effort to rein in spending.”

In October, Hultgren warned that inaction by lawmakers would set the stage for the largest tax increase in the nation’s history.

“I’ve already voted against raising taxes on all Americans, and I cannot support an irresponsible bill which doesn’t begin to address the problem that got us into this mess in the first place,” Hultgren said of the bill approved Tuesday.

Related:

Related Topics: Randy Hultgren and fiscal cliff

Buckgrove

7:51 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Yes, he is. He does't understand that his job requires compromise.

Reply

Ed Arter

10:01 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

I would like to see a list of all (both sides of the asile) lame ducks who delayed action by unyeilding compromise.

Reply

Holly

1:08 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

He is not a lame duck, he was just re-elected.

Reply

Holly

1:13 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

And many don't see the bill that was passed as a compromise of any kind, by the way.

Reply

Ed Arter

5:03 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Here's the break down on the "New" 2013 congress starting today. Hopefully they can make some decisions in a timely fashion.
In the House, there will be a total of 233 Republicans, 200 Democrats, and two vacancies (likely to be filled by one Republican and one Democrat, respectively.)
In the Senate, Democrats will continue to control the Senate – but with a slightly larger 55-45 majority than the 112th congress, with two independents caucusing with the Democrats.

Reply

Leave a comment