patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Peck Wins by a Huge Margin in GOP Battle to Be 49th District Senate Nominee

The Plainfield village trustee handily beat three GOP challengers for a chance to face Democrat Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant in the general election.

 

With more than 3,200 votes separating him from his next closest competitor, Plainfield Village Trustee Garrett Peck was the hands-down winner in his bid to be the Republican nominee for the newly created 49th Senate seat.

Peck's 7,069 votes was just a few hundred shy of double the amount tallied by the next highest vote-getter, Shorewood Village Trustee Gary Fitzgerald, with 3,793. Will County Board member Brian Smith, of Plainfield, received 1,981 votes and Oswego Village Trustee Tony Giles, 1,333.

Peck, 32, was the first of four candidates to announce his candidacy in June, and has long signaled a desire to seek a higher office beyond the Plainfield Village Board, to which he was elected in 2009.

He now faces Democratic challenger Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant, a Shorewood resident who is the Will County regional superintendent of schools. The general election is Nov. 6.

Peck said he plans to get right back on the campaign trail Wednesday. He had already secured the endorsement of Plainfield Mayor Michael Collins Tuesday night, he said.

"We're not going to rest," Peck said. "We're already working ... and I'm looking forward to addressing the issues and to discussing ways to be fiscally responsible to the taxpayers."

He believes his strong pro-business positions, his Plainfield Village Board voting record and his "focused" campaign made the difference when voters went to the polls.

He added that he hopes he'll have an opportunity to debate Bertino-Tarrant before the general election, where the differences between them can be emphasized. "I would love it," Peck said.

Fitzgerald, Peck's next closest competitor, declined to discuss why Peck out-tallied his competitors by such a high margin but congratulated him as the winner and said he would have his support in the November election.

Fitzgerald said he was proud of his campaign, which was only possible with the backing of his family, friends and supporters. He added that his goal in running was to put a spotlight on the problems in Springfield, and he thinks that's been accomplished.

"I hope the state makes a full and lasting recovery from the situation it finds itself in," Fitzgerald said.

The new 49th District Senate seat has no incumbent because it was created with the redistricting that followed the 2010 U.S. Census. It includes all or parts of Plainfield, Shorewood, Romeoville, Oswego and Montgomery.

Will County has 93 precincts in the district; Kendall County has 21.

For more information on the candidates, click here.

Results:

 Will 
 Kendall 
 Total 
Precincts Reporting
93 21
114
Brian J. Smith 1740
241
1981
Gary M. Fitzgerald 3286 507 3793
Garrett M. Peck 6249 820 7069
J. Anthony Giles
662 671 1333
Related Topics: 2012 primary, 49th District, Election Results, and Illinois Senate

Ed Arter

10:29 pm on Tuesday, March 20, 2012

No;
Yes;
YES;
yes;
Don't Care;
Felons and Cons won't go far anyway;
yes;
YES,Ticket to include mandatory drive school / and a 6 month suspension of device priveledges;
Don't Know

Reply

Ed Arter

8:09 am on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Thanks MC. Sounds like LINK Stinks

Reply

Butch

8:14 am on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Peck won because he is the most conservative.
Simple as that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

2:12 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

along with principled, logical, and well spoken. Amen

jaskie1505

9:44 am on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Now we just have to wait to see if we can get a candidate worthy of running on our fine ticket against the winners on the Dem and Rep side last night. Is Nelson running?

Reply

Nelson Supporter

1:38 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

I believe Mr. Nelson was leaning against running if Gary Fitzgerald won the primary... I would fathom last night's results would make him re-consider based on who's formally on the ballot. Knowing a little about him, I know he thinks he can win but is considering how it would affect his private consulting business. He has said in the past that if he is going to do it, he needs to be certain that he is 100% committed. I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Reply

Olddeegee

4:06 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Great. A puppet of the RNC, just what we need.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

11:56 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Ha, not even close, he didn't get a dime of Establishment support, they ran 3 RINO's against him. Maybe you should take a closer look at his record and read some facts before spitting out ignorant comments. He's the real deal.

JPits

10:22 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Garrett is a great choice for State Senator! Best to him in November! Best to the 49th would be with Peck!

Reply

Nelson Supporter

8:06 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Let's stop talking about oversized suits and wrinkled shirts for a second and focus on what Peck believes in terms of support the GOP platform.

- Substantially cut programs that are important for low & middle income working class families (affordable health care for all, education programs, food stamp assistance, Pell Grants - college $ for low income students, etc.).

- Extend Bush cuts for the wealthy & lower capital gains but NOT address the added tax burdens for the working poor.

- End the Medicare guarantee and stick seniors with the bill.

Why on earth would the 49th district that is mostly comprised of middle income families support programs THAT DO NOT BENEFIT THEM?! It doesn't make sense and leads me to believe that voters vote on the basis of what political sign they see on election day versus having a true understanding of what it at stake.

We need an independently minded candidate that can clearly articulate the pros/cons of policy issues that would impact our district. Mr. Nelson, when do you on making a final decision?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

11:54 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Right Because Quinn and the Dems have done a great job helping the middle class by raising our income taxes by 67% or increasing corporate tax rates. Standard liberal false arguments that don't address the issues. Tax and Spend Democrats have destroyed this state... It's time for a common sense business owner with values to lead us out of the mess your party put us in. Get back to MSNBC, and keep spitting out talking points.

Dan Raddatz

5:03 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Hey Garrett,
Are you going to stop by and autograph my lawn sign! Your win had some impressive numbers, congratulation on your win, your half way their.

Reply

JD

11:51 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

I supported Garrett and will continue to support him; he is a common sense conservative with the people's interest at the forefront of his ideology. He will win in November. Congratulations Garrett may this be a grass roots movement to elect common sense leadership that works for the people of Illinois.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mecando

7:00 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

More tea drinkers to help destroy the USA. Republicons no taxes for the rich, just spend everyone elses money and charge it on the Jesus charge card.........

Nelson Supporter

12:09 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

@ Conservative. While I agree that the majority party in IL has not been as fiscally responsible as they should be (and the tax plan signed in 2011 is deeply flawed), my comments are not talking points but ones supported by conservative-minded economists. You cannot CUT your way to prosperity. It needs to be a combination of cuts and increased revenue measures (not balancing it on the backs of the middle class however). By the way, just so FOX doesn't brainwash you where you forget... Bush tax cuts for the wealthy that the GOP devised & passed (NOT PAID FOR), Medicare Part B (NOT PAID FOR), 2 wars (NOT PAID FOR OR IN ACTUAL BUDGET). Sorry Conservative... unfortunately when you run under a political party or movement (ex: Tea Party), you are agreeing with their platform. All politicians should be held to their beliefs and then the voters should decide what direction they want the country to go in. Good luck to your candidate in the fall!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

2:23 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

You can't spend our way into prosperity with tax payer’s money. You can't become prosperous by giving more food stamps to individuals (Give a man a fish he eats for a day, teach him to fish he eats forever) BUSH WAS NOT A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE, let me make it clear, I never endorsed George Bush, but because your liberal arguments make you believe that because I am CONSERVATIVE both fiscally and socially I am somehow out of touch with the country founded on conservative principles and ideology. Medicare part D i believe you are talking about was not a good idea nor was it paid for. What you call "Tax Cuts” are actually a reduction in the overall Tax Rate. If the "Buffet Tax" was implemented The CBO scored it at 31 billion dollars Over 10 years... here from Yahoo liberal news http://news.yahoo.com/report-just-31b-buffett-rule-tax-rich-162408568.html
I wish I had time to educate you as a so called independent, but the truth is you’re a liberal trying to act like you’re above the party politics. I’m a conservative by principle, notice you’ll never hear about “moderate or liberal values” mainly because they don’t have any. So keep throwing ignorant comments about fox news, bush, and the tea party freely around as if you understand what the silent majority of Americans want from political leaders.

Nelson Supporter

4:15 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

I hate to say it Conservative but you are exactly why the general public dislikes politics or chooses to stay on the sideline....extreme right logic that is tone deaf to any other individual's thoughts or ideas. You also show your true colors by calling OUR president a Socialist...you are probably a "birther" as well and question the legitimacy of him holding office. You better hope that Santorum wins the nomination. If not, I would expect you to sit on the sidelines as Mitt makes W look like a far right winger.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mecando

7:05 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

Not to worry, If Mitt can't buy it he sure can't win it.....If my president is to be called a socialist, that is better than a Republicon Terrorist like we had for 8 years.............

Leave a comment