patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Seven DUIs Caught During St. Pat's Crackdown

Police also issued 328 tickets during a seat belt campaign and 10 tickets for stopping on top of or too close to train tracks during an enforcement at a railroad grade crossing.

 

During two recent law enforcement campaigns, the Plainfield Police Department made seven driving under the influence arrests and issued 328 tickets for seat belt violations and 10 for stopping too close to or on top of railroad tracks.

The first was conducted from March 12 to 20, and was aimed at impaired drivers and people not wearing seat belts, according to a release issued by the department Thursday. It was particularly focused on St. Patrick's Day, which happened to fall on a Saturday this year and tends to be a day on which some people over-imbibe.

The Plainfield railroad crossing crackdown was held on March 21 at the tracks on Route 126, east of Route 29. Police from Canadian National and BNSF railroads assisted.

In addition to issuing 10 tickets to people stopped within the grade crossing, they also cited one person for not having insurance, one for violating the child passenger safety act, one for driving while license suspended and one for disobeying a no passing zone. Three people received warnings for stopping within a railroad grade crossing.

Related Topics: Arrests, Campaign, Citations, Driving Under The Influence, Dui, Plainfield Police Department, Railroad crossing, Seat Belts, and Tickets

Hugo

7:55 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

I know it's silly to ask something as vague as: "how did that improve traffic safety EXACTLY?" Other than the dui enforcement, I mean.

A more precise answer could be yielded by asking: How much money did the village get from IDOT to ticket people for seatbelts on the SLOWEST STREET IN THE VILLAGE? That's to say, Lockport Street.

Sad.

Reply

T-Bone

9:16 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

I know this is hard to believe but I agree with Hugo,,,

I would also like to know what made the difference for the people who got warnings and who got tickets for the same violation? Was it Family and Friend day? Were they having a 25% off sale? I don't get it...

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Karen Sorensen

11:24 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

C'mon, BP, I know you can make your point without resorting to name-calling.

Reply

Zaney

6:51 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

I love that the Plainfield Police Department is working hard for our village on VERY LITTLE TAX DOLLARS. I for one appreciate all of their efforts.

Reply

T-Bone

7:04 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Just because they have very little tax dollars doesn't mean the have to harass the few people we get to our Downtown Area just to get income. Do they realize that people will shop in another area so they don't have to worry about the PPD? What kind of Sales Tax Base are they running away from Plainfield by doing these checks? Standing at a Stop Sign, RR Crossing, or in front of a Bar waiting for someone to leave is not Policing it is Cherry Picking! I will stay North, South or go around Downtown just for this reason!

Reply

Hugo

8:19 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

The downtown is definately a joke. No parking and police sniping seat-belts. Heck, I don't even see a concerted effort to keep semis off Lockport Street.

Is there an upside I'm unaware of??

People respond to the carrot and stick. The downtown is just STICK STICK STICK. The whole thing is a pain in the ass under the best of circumstances.

Reply

Mike G

11:11 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

I with Hugo. I was on Lockport st. leaving one parking spot for another further up downtown and was stuck in traffic and got a saeatbelt ticket. I had a clean record and got no warning just a ticket. I was very polite to the officer. I for one will now avoid downtown, and I live in Plainfield. I guess they dont want to frequent businesses on Lockport street so I wont.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

11:44 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

It is well past being a joke.

I was pulled over a few months back in downtown, for no obvious reason. When the officer came up to the car, he said he saw a 'video display' in my dash board, and was going to give me a ticket for distracted driving. Turns out he was actually trying to claim my radio in my dashboard was a 'video display', and that I 'could have' been watching a DVD on it.

After I showed him there was no DVD in the player, I politely pointed out that there was also an in-car aftermarket video/audio recording device that I installed(for insurance reasons), just like they have in their squad cars, but much more visually appealing.

Turns out, when they notice they are being recorded, they tend to back off the threats and nonsense. It is unfortunate that I needed to have hundreds of dollars of equipment in order to protect myself from this nonsense. What about the people who can't afford/don't have this equipment? Are they just at the whims of whatever gets made up on the spot?

There is no way I will ever return to downtown for any reason though. There is nothing there that I can not get elsewhere, and without the unnecessary hassle of having to explain what a 'new radio' is to a police officer.

Comment_arrow

Olddeegee

12:20 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

If you start your car, put on your seat-belt. Problem solved.

Comment_arrow

Tim

10:46 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

clearly bogus?
http://www.eaprotection.com/in-car-video-recorder-with-gps.aspx
There are even smartphone apps to accomplish the same thing with your phone. welcome to the 21st century.

Comment_arrow

Tim

11:06 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

That is not just 'some judges opinion'.

It is a ruling with the full force of the judicial system. The existing law was found unconstitutional.

Miguel Sanchez

11:41 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Cici's and AT&T should relocate adjacent to the RR tracks.

Reply

jocko

12:26 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

What's downtown???crappy bars and crappy stores.

Reply

jocko

1:04 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Waaaaaa I have to wear a seatbelt to protect me from going through my windshield....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike G

1:38 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Joko your right. In my case I was just going from one parking spot down town to another about 2 blocks up the street. I should of had my seet belt on but with a 20 mph speed limit and speed bumps every block I dont think I was going throught the windshield. I dont drink and drive either but I object to police road blocks set up for dui's, seat belts or other violations. AI think it's in bad form to have police cars looking for minor violations in down town Plainfield where businesses are already suffering. Some of the new restaurants are good and the car shows make for a nice walk downtown. Plainfield is trying to revitalize the downtown area but giving tickets is not the way to do it.

jocko

1:43 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Laws are in place to protect those who wont protect themselfs...you may not drink and drive but what about the person who dose and t-bones you moving your car?

Reply

MidwestGal

2:17 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

...worse, you may hit one of the too many unhelmeted, drunkin motorcyclists downtown while unseatbelted. Make sure your car has the yellow bumper sticker that says "Start Seeing Motorcycles" on it.

Reply

Mike G

3:06 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

of course I would not like it but I still don't believe in random road blocks. There are risks when you live in a free society or what once was.

Reply

Hugo

4:18 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

>>Turns out, when they notice they are being recorded, they tend to back off the threats and nonsense.

Wow, Tim. You explained the funcion of the digital display, and you got a warning? Oh gosh, what tyrants! Nazis even. I'm sure he freaked out when he saw you were recording him...errr...wait, every cruiser I've seen has their own camera. That makes no sense.

The point here is the concerted effort to camp-out for seat-belt tickets, not criticize every traffic stop they make, even if it happens to occur in the downtown area.

Frankly, it is a good place certain things, like hoodrats blasting unwanted music, for drunks who think they're entitled to drive 1/4 mile home, or for semis sneaking through. But seatbelts on a 20 mph street? C'mon...that's shameless.

And you know the village board is just lapping it all up.

Reply

Hugo

4:18 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

And I know they're reading this.

Reply

Defense Att

6:50 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Wear your seatbelt. Don't stop on railroads tracks and don't get hammered and think you can drive home, PROBLEMS SOLVED and. Come on, this goes on in every city in the country.

Reply

Defense Att

6:55 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Actually, HUGO, if you look at past police blotter or articles on patch and herald, there has been numerous serious crashes in the downtown lockport street area. Since when does the speed limit have anything to do with crashes??? You obviously know nothing about traffic safety when it comes to speed and crashes. Bad crash in front of Moejoe's involving duo driver and bad multi vehicle crash in front of bin 48

Reply

billy

7:32 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

I'd rather pay for a seat belt ticket than an increase in taxes. I'd hate to be a police officer, damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Reply

Tommy

8:25 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Good point billy, ill pay $50 and move on, plus I would not cry about it on the patch

Reply

Hugo

8:14 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

>>Since when does the speed limit have anything to do with crashes???

With crashes in general? Maybe nothing. In terms of severity and priority...gee, I don't know. Almost everything? Kinetic energy, acceleration, momentum, intertia...etc. The things which create forces on the human body inside.

Exceptions don't make a rule, and ain't nobody getting ejected from crashes on the downtown Lockport Street. LOL.

Good point Billy. I'm glad you acknowledge the default-tax that it really is. A little sad that you're fine with it, though.

Reply

billy

9:39 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I'm fine with it because it's a tax we can all prevent paying by wearing our seat belts. Seat belts help prevent injury or death. Traffic fatalities cost tax payers more money than if the accident did not result in death.

Reply

T-Bone

9:59 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

If everyone started wearing their seatbelt they would find something else to hit the people with! This is just PPD trying to get another award for Traffic Safety but what it doesn't say on the award is they were on a street with Speed bumps, Stop signs, and they Stand on the corner to Cherry Pick.

It kills two birds with one stone, They get the tickets and do not have to waste gas, I get it. But I bet they wouldn't stand in front of Menards or Meijers and get away with the businesses not saying leave, so why run the people off from Downtown?!

I'm telling you, they are here to Serve and Protect, Not Intimidate and Pound their Chest!!

Reply

justadude

10:16 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

the plainfield pd in downtown is driving people away...plain and simple. small town police department overkill syndrome. glad i don't own a business down there. it's hard enough getting in and out of there. and then they add the Gestapo style pd...people will easily go elsewhere. downtown and plainfield is rightfully gaining the reputation of happy ticket writing cops. lesson 101: how to ruin the economy in a small downtown? just hang out for a day or two on lockport, you'll see.

Reply

billy

11:03 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

A police officer standing on a street corner should not intimidate anyone. Especially when you know you've done nothing wrong. The enforcement that this article refers to didn't even take place on Lockport street west of 59 (downtown businesses). They have in the past, but not this one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

justadude

11:17 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

billy: i know a great neighborhood for you, it's in russia. you would be very happy there.

Comment_arrow

Tim

1:05 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

no billy, ONE of the enforcements took place there(the one that the article lists is happening on rt 29? Must be an article by Karen Sorenson).

The other enforcements happen on lockport street, and my particular incident was from one officer standing on the sidewalk in a yellow jersey, radioing to the pack of cop cars down the street sitting in the parking lot waiting for you to pass by and pull you over.

I did do nothing wrong, and was in fact 'bothered' for the fact that the officer was confused that my radio was a video display. Even after I pointed out it was not a video display, I was still getting a ticket for 'distracted driving' until the recording device was pointed out.

In the short-term, this may increase revenue, in the long-run it will have a longer lasting effect on tax revenue downtown. In the big picture, it is a net negative if this keeps going on.

T-Bone

11:46 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Exactly Dude! The Normal Person gets intimidated by the Police because it is a position of authority. It's natural...they Know it, Love it and most people don't want to deal with it.

Reply

T-Bone

3:18 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

<Illinois judge: law barring recording police is unconstitutional>

<Judge Sacks seemed to declare Illinois' law unconstitutional not because it's a citizen's right to record interactions between the police and the public, but because the law was too far-reaching.>

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

4:48 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

A Joliet police officer was recently fired, and is now being criminally charged for assault for an event that took place a few months ago.

Surveillance video proved his guilt.

T-Bone

3:56 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Well the PPD sould be happy they will have to worry about 1 less Bar in Plainfield after tonight. Limestone just announced they are closing at the close of business tonight. Plainfield just keeps getting better!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

4:44 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Karen should be happy that all her negative rumor stories have helped close yet another business. It's going to be hard to get local advertisers to support the patch business model when those bridges are constantly burned. Patch itself has less than 9 months before it goes under, watch for it by the new year.

T-Bone

5:11 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Well Limestone said it was the Landlord getting foreclosed on so I am sure there are a few more to come out of that center...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

6:46 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

And not a single one of those businesses are passing on news tips to Patch like they once did.

Over the past 6 months, they have all had the chance to see on their own how patch treats people in the community.

I mentioned in the past that plainfield has a tight knit business community, and word gets around quickly within those circles. There is a reason nothing is posted on Patch about it yet, as they burn all their bridges on a regular basis

Jacob

6:36 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I highly doubt businesses are closing or people are not visiting downtown plainfield because of the police presence, have u ever been to downtown Naperville, Downers Grove or Elmhurst??? They have specific units designated for downtown patrol. Just wear ur damn belt and stop crying about the police doing their jobs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

6:50 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I visit all those downtown areas, and not a single one of them treats visitors as bad as plainfield does. Plainfield gives the impression that they are nothing more than overpaid hall monitors, and that lasts well after the initial contact.

"Hey, you want to go out tonight?"
"Sure, but lets stay away from plainfield this time. Remember what happened the last few times we were there?"

Time will tell what the long term effects of this will be.

julie

7:34 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Tim, sounds like you and your friends have either been stopped for drinking and driving or been issued a seat belt violation, because what else would deter you from visiting downtown???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

7:40 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Perhaps you should bother to read the entire thread, where I describe exactly why and exactly what happened.

It will keep you from making unfounded assumptions that make you look foolish.

Larry Wright

9:18 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Eyes on plfd, I believe some of the PPD cars are equipped with in car video, so there would be no reason to video tape for yourself.

Reply

billy

9:48 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Tim,
I read your first post to this article. Upon reading it, I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Of course there are always 3 sides to every story. But your side is the only side I know. I didn't comment on it then, because of that. Your recent post, calling the police "nothing more than overpaid hall monitors", has takin some of your credibility away, in my opinion. Because you had one bad experience ( in your opinion) with ONE police officer out of the entire department, does not justify your statement.

You said you were pulled over for "no obvious reason". Okay, well maybe it wasn't "obvious" to you but according to you, the officer did exactly what he was supposed to do. He told you exactly why he stopped you. Then based on your account, he allowed you to talk yourself out of a ticket. I also viewed the link you provided of your video system. If yours is installed like the one on the picture that you provided, you could have received a citation for obstructed view as it is illegal to have anything suspended from the windshield.
It sounds like you met an officer who

Reply

billy

9:52 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

.... Continuing (pc froze)
Thought he saw something, allowed you to explain what he saw, and apparently thought you didn't need a ticket. Even for the obstructed view. That sounds like a very positive police contact to me.

Also, why haven't you responded to my consciences allegations?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

8:24 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

I didn't talk myself out of a ticket, as I said, I was in the process of getting one until it was pointed out that there would be 'proof' as to the encounter that significantly disagreed with the ticket being written. Police are trained to 'take control of a situation', and nothing I said would have changed that false ticket from being issued. Only when it was obvious that there was a video record did the ticket suddenly stop being written. It is not obstructed view, as it is part of the rear view mirror which already exists(it is legal). I gave the link as an example of what I use, not of exactly what I use.

I don't respond to MC allegations, because there are a litany of them every week. It has been alleged that I am a lawyer, or working for the village of shorewood, or working for the village of plainfield, or working for the developer of apartment buildings, or working for the brew fest, or posting under various names, and on and on. When we disagree, I am automatically assumed to be 'working' for whatever side I fall on. How am I supposed to respond to links posted of non-existent web pages? He seems more focused on continuing his own speculation of me, than with whatever the topic being discussed is. So, after months of the accusation-of-the-week, I have become tired of justifying his speculations(always without any proof of course), and no longer bother responding to them.

Comment_arrow

Tim

8:25 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

cont....

The reason it is important for you to record your own events as well, is that the police have a less than stellar record of not destroying this evidence when it proves your innocence and/or their guilt. It even has a specific name because it has recently gone all the way to the IL supreme court. It is now known as a "Kladis motion".

"....the tape requested by defendant had been erased [by the department] at 4:24 a.m. on June 3, 2008, just hours before the parties first appeared in court."

JeffK

12:00 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

It has nothing to do with safety and everything about raising money. That is why the give you a P ticket. They try to say they are doing you a favor because it is cheaper than the other one. The reason it is cheaper is because the village gets to keep 100% of it. The more expensive one gets split with the state.

Reply

Paul K

12:45 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

Come on people, if you think law enforcement is not a money maker for these villages. Your crazy. Accepts it, no matter where you liven drive through or visit, law enforcement uses citations, arrests, tows and other ways for making money. Now that we all know it, move on. They are doing their jobs, just because it hits your pocket book, everyone whines about it. follow your state and local ordinances and you won't have an issue.

Reply

Baba O'Riley

7:29 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

OK I agree that the seatbelt tickets are borderline. This recent crackdown is targeted at habitual bad drivers. The blatant speeders that must travel at least 15-20 over the limit. School zone or not. The red light runners, tailgaters, stop sign rollers, cell phoners, uninsured, unlicensed etc...I am all for issuing tickets to these rude, ill mannered drivers particularly in our downtown area. Again the somewhat petty seatbelt tickets are borderline but these other violations are out of control.

Reply

T-Bone

7:57 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

That's just it Baba, The tickets you are ok with...none were given for those offenses.

Reply

Hugo

8:24 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

Yeah, I still can't get over how much Tim is complaining about getting a warning??

TV monitors are illegal. Cop thought he saw one. Learned it wasn't. No enforcement action taken.

Tim...why don't you "rage against the machine" later when you have a slightly more interesting reason?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim

8:41 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

read that again.
Cop thought he saw one...Learned it wasn't... CONTINUED to write the ticket anyway.... pointed out encounter was being recorded... then no enforcement action taken.

Hugo

2:05 pm on Sunday, March 25, 2012

>>...encounter was being recorded... then no enforcement action taken.

He was already recording the encounter himself, most likely.

Give it up. The NATO summit is soon. Go rage against...whatever...over there. Get your skull cracked and then come b1tch.

Reply

my conscience

6:33 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Dear “Tim”: By the grace of God, you have been granted this second reprieve. Please conduct yourself in a manner worthy of The Village of Plainfield citizens, and treat all people with the respect that you seek yourself.

You know the potential consequences if you or your agent provocateurs screen clones start any nefarious activities again – including attacks on Karen. So my friend, good luck to you as you begin your new journey. Use this gift wisely.

Reply
Comment_arrow

T-Bone

10:09 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Wow, You must be more powerful then I first realized. Makes a normal resident like me wonder who you actually might be...Sounds like "Tim" better start kissing your ring!

Zaney

7:51 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Don't break the law. Done and done. And FYI, I have lived in Plainfield 15 years and going downtown has NOTHING to do with the police and EVERYTHING to do with parking, shops not being open late, etc. I am SO HAPPY the PPD are around.

Reply

Everyone Hates My Conscience

11:06 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Thank God My conscience is gone, coincidence that Tim is gone as well

Reply

Leave a comment