Teachers Rally in Plainfield to Oppose Pension Reforms
Educators say they want the chance to have their say before any big changes are made.
Several dozen teachers, both current and retired, rallied outside House Republican Leader Tom Cross’ office in Plainfield Wednesday with one message: Don’t mess with our pensions.
Organized by Educators United for Strong Public Schools and partner Northern Illinois Jobs with Justice, the event was held in protest of proposed changes that some educators fear would gut the pension system.
Dennis Grosskopf, president of the Minooka Education Association and former Will County Democratic Party chairman, said teachers just want to make sure their voices are heard.
“We’re turning in a petition asking for hearings on any pension changes,” he said, pointing out that lawmakers held weeks of hearings before voting on legislative redistricting last year.
“They haven’t done so on pensions,” Grosskopf said. “The public has to have input."
According to the Associated Press, Illinois has $83 billion in unfunded pension liability, with more than half – $44 billion — from the Teachers Retirement System. Many of the demonstrators said they believe proposed pension reforms would free the state of the financial burden, at the expense of teachers.
“We did our part for many years,” said Theresa Wiedman, a retired Oswego District 308 teacher. “It’s not our fault that we’re in this bind,” she added, noting that Illinois teachers pay 9.4 percent of their salaries into the pension fund.
“We haven’t missed a dime,” said Greg Bouchard, an English teacher at Plainfield Central High School. “It’s not reform, it’s thievery … It’s about them trying to cheat and steal and not pay what they owe.”
Todd Mertz, a teacher at Neuqua Valley High School in Indian Prairie District 204, said rally organizers chose Cross’ office in part because Cross was a sponsor of Senate Bill 512, a reform bill that would have required state employees to pay significantly more into their pensions, or pay the same amount but receive lower benefits.
“Cross is important because he really wants to slam us,” Mertz said.
Another pension reform suggestion, supported by Gov. Pat Quinn, would shift the burden for paying out pensions onto local school districts.
Joni Lindgren, spokeswoman for EUSPS and a retired West Aurora teacher, led a contingent into Cross’ office, where they presented staff with the petitions. According to Grosskopf, more than 500 signatures were collected in print and online.
The group also attempted to reach Cross, who was in Springfield, by phone.
Though he did not speak to the demonstrators, Cross issued a statement to Patch, saying he wants to hear what the teachers have to say.
“Over the last year I have received hundreds of phone calls, emails, letters and visits to my office regarding the issue of pension reform,” Cross said. “I have tried my best to personally respond. I always welcome and appreciate my constituents’ opinions and concerns regarding the tough issues we are dealing with at the capitol in Springfield.”
Joshua Wessell, district communications director at Cross’ Plainfield office, brought bottled water out to the demonstrators.
“They’re welcome here,” he said. “We hope they know that. We want them to know they’re being heard.”
Chanting slogans including “Keep our pensions,” the demonstrators stood at the intersection of Lockport and Des Plaines streets, cheering each time a motorist honked a horn at them.
Mertz said he wants to see legislators find new funding sources for pensions rather than gutting the system.
“They have not paid their full share [into the pension system] since 1953,” he said, suggesting making the switch from a flat tax to a graduated income tax system and expanding gaming as possible ways to increase revenue. “We’ve made sacrifices over the years and now they’re saying, ‘Too bad.’ There’s no shared sacrifice — it’s all on teachers’ backs.”
Charlotte Manis
6:58 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Right on, teachers! Those of you who know me, know that I would be there with you if I still lived in Illinois.
My greatest wonder is how you all helped elect a president with the same kind of erroneus thinking. I hope and pray that you do some serious thinking about that, too.
C. Manis
Christine
7:10 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
While I agree that politicians did steal teachers' pension money and that was totally wrong, pushing that shortfall onto the taxpayer is also wrong. Where they're going to get the money they stole is beyond me, but the taxpayer cannot afford to assume responsibility for it. Pushing it onto the school districts just means they will raise property taxes (without a referendum, by the way). People are strapped now. Those idiots in office better come up with a better plan, because people are leaving the state in droves because of activity like this.
Butch
7:19 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
You made your sacrifices albright. A school year is 1060 some hours. For everybody else it's 2080. And no, I don't think you have it coming. You inform the administators 4 years in advance that you plan on taking your pension and they give you "BUMPS" in salary every year so as to give you a much larger pension than you have earned. This should be investigated and every bump you received removed and your pensions adjusted to where they should honestly be. This should put the pensions close to black ink. Also once you reach 55 you get a 3% cola every year thereafter. I think that should be removed and your cola's adjusted to inflation like everybody else who has one.
Let's start with these ideas and after that we will start talking about getting into the taxpayers pockets.
Dan Sperry
7:46 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Madigan has been in charge for over forty years. He has received the various state unions support throughout his years of leadership. His leadership has managed this state into bankruptcy. Don't the state unions bare some responsibility by supporting a leader who have put this state in a situation where it can't pay its bills?
Zach
7:49 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Dear Butch,
A school year is 1060 hours by your math. So come on in and teach high school with me, and tell me if my 1060 hours feels like your 2080. I'm guessing it will feel like a lot more.
And your math is fuzzy, by the way: My school day is 7 hours and 20 minutes. Include the 30 minutes I'm here before school preparing for my day and the 30 I spend after school (on a good day) doing other things related to my work, and you've got 8 hours and 20 minutes. Add in grading, and you can give me a conservative 9 hour work day. I get about 13 weeks off a year (and this, I would never even CONSIDER complaining about), which means I work 39 weeks x 45 hours a week. Grand total: 1755 hours. Add in stuff I get paid extra for (working sporting events, teaching summer school, organizing and running a club...), and my hours reach 2000 a year. I'm guessing there are some incredibly lazy teachers in your school district who work 500 a year. I have no problem with removing those teachers. But don't pretend FOR A SECOND that I work fewer hours just because you have a calculator.
Russ
7:58 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
People are really hot about teacher pensions, and very few of the actual facts are generally known. Fact #1: all teachers pay for their pensions and insurance. It is part of their total compensation no matter how it is packaged (you can say you make $50,000 and you pay your pension/insurance or you make $30,000 and your pension/insurance is paid by the district…the numbers are the same, period). Fact #2: teachers are not eligible for their full social security benefit, even if they have paid in all their quarters – that was taken away long ago and the present system was put into force. Fact #3: teachers and school districts have never missed a retirement payment to the state… underfunding of teacher pension fund by the State over the years totals $15 billion dollars, which has now resulted in over $43 billion in unfunded liability. Fact #3: teachers are paid based on their educational preparation and experience…for those who are all worked up about teachers retiring at 55 and the "bumps" – please know that was instituted by the state in order to get the highest paid teachers out and hire brand new teachers in at a much lower salary…does anybody really think that teaching an extra 12 years at top salary is really going to save anybody any money??? That will cost the taxpayers MILLIONS. All this was promised by the state, written into law - and now they want to change their minds because they "borrowed" teacher retirement funds and can't pay it back. Fact.
Barbara Palmer
8:11 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@Butch: you are misinformed about the "bump.". Not every school district offered this. It was up to each school board. Also you only get the 3% if you retire not when you are 55. I retired at 66 with no "bump." When I taught I worked much longer than 2080 hours. I taught English. Try grading 150 essays quickly. Better yet, try teaching for one day and you will be amazed at what you learn about a very stressful profession.
Nick
8:19 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Fact #1 - Fact #4 should follow Fact#3 - Hope you have a sense of humor Russ!!! Serious point to make is that the government has made promises and commitments to WAY TO MANY people, organizations and projects to possibly keep them all. Our only hope of that smart people prioritize and evaluate the problem fairly and with an eye towards the future, though it seems that we continue to think we can live on credit forever with no consequence. As long as politicians believe they can get elected/reelected on promises and payback, we will have these issues.
Lisa S.
8:35 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I agree that this is a bad situation. The state has done it to themselves, and they need to fix it with a creative solution. Throwing it back at taxpayers and districts is not the way. Instead of all the protests maybe the teachers and their unions can come up with some good ideas. I know a lot of teachers and there are a rare few who can complain about their compensation in comparison with other fields. The insurance benefits alone puts them in the 'lucky' category. And I am sure it is different at the high school level...but I live next to an elementary school and most of the teachers (and admin) roll in right before school starts and rarely is the parking lot not empty within 15 minutes of the end.
ap
9:15 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
when i got into teaching i couldnt care less what retirement packages were, etc. i knew i was going into something i cared about and enjoyed, all for 22, 000 a year! fast forward 22 years, because downstate used our retirement fund as a personal piggy bank, teachers who have cared about your kids all these years are being blasted as the bad guys, the tribune is the worst at this. i have personally told my daughter and nieces not to even think about going into education. trust me, keep up the teacher as the bad guy routine and in the next generation you will not see our brightest most inteliigent going into the profession, then see where we are at! like i tell kids thinking about a career ,dont do what i did (teaching) do something that is respected and your career/livelihoood doesnt depend on some test scores of 15 year olds! what comes into the education profession down the road, because of all the mandates, retirement reductions, lack of parental support, lack of administrative support will lead to our grandkids receiving what will be the worst education in the history of this state.
John Moreli
9:30 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
The actual fault of pension short comings are the fault of State and local government! For year after year after year they failed to put the matching funds into the pension plans while the workers put their share into the plans! Also the State and local government borrow money from the pension plans and never pay it back! Thus causing pension failures and not the unions fault at all! As for downstate Police and Fire pension plans the State does not contribute to it all and have no say so or interest in the plans!
Donna
9:32 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I don't think we should lash out at the teachers. For the most part, they work very hard and are very passionate about their work. Yes, there are some bad apples and thanks to the unions and tenure, we are forced to deal with teachers we cannot get rid of. The real blame falls on Speaker Madigan, Gov. Blago and all of the Democrats who negotiated with the unions and bargained away the State's yearly pension obligation. They were making back room deals to get what they wanted with no concern for what would happen down the road. If I were a teacher, I would be out of my head crazy mad at the unions who were supposed to represent me and look out for my best interest. Time to turn your anger on the perpetrators of the crime.
Chill Out People
9:57 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Lisa S.
Just because the parking lot is empty does not mean teachers still do not work...many of us have family responsibilities that we must leave to attend to since at least for me, my family comes first! Watch those teachers leaving every day and see how many of them are carrying tote bags and crates full of papers and projects to grade. Many teachers get work done late at night when their family responsibilities are taken care of.
John Moreli
10:06 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I support the teachers 100% ! When are all politicians and political officer holders going to change their pension plans first! They sit on their asses making more money than teachers , Police and Firemen! and their pension plans pay them more and in a shorter time for less years of service and make the big pensions! When they change their pension plans first, then come talk to us about teacher , Police and Fire Pensions!
Tim
10:57 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Looks like all PR arm of the union has been busy telling people that the state is 'stealing' their money.
The actual law says something different though;
The pension system sets 'expected' goals for the growth of its pension plan. When these expected goals fall short(because they are unsustainable), the state is required by law to make up the difference.
This is where the 'state is not paying' idea is based from. The union is twisting it to shift the blame to politicians, because lets be honest it's easy to convince people that politicians are at fault.
In 2010, the union lowered its expected rate to 8.5%, while it was only getting 3.4% in reality. Overnight, the state became responsible for over half of the contributions because it is law that the state make up the difference, and that totaled in the hundreds of millions of dollars just by the union changing its expectations.
The union is on a tear to write letters to the editor in hundreds of papers around the state to pass off this half-truth. And since the pension system is complex, it can be difficult for the average person to read all the fine details. The union is counting on this and using this to fool the taxpayers.
Every time, the distraction seems to come up to focus on the politicians retirement plans. Nobody who uses this distraction actually posts the numbers in a dollar amount this would total. Probably because the numbers are so small it would destroy their argument before they even started it.
jesswiz
12:27 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim-
Politics aside, I'm confused about something that you wrote. Could you please clarify it for me?
You wrote, "In 2010, the union lowered its expected rate to 8.5%, while it was only getting 3.4% in reality."
If the union LOWERED its expected rate, how is that costing the state MORE? Is it just because the shortfall was bigger due to the lack of revenue from investments and therefore the gap between expected and actual LARGER than normal? What was the rate previous to the 8.5% it was changed to?
Just trying to understand the math...
Thanks.
Tim
1:26 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Because the pension system gets to define what its 'expected' rate of return is. When it falls short, the state is on the hook to make up the difference.
They could have easily adjusted this expected rate to what they knew they were getting as a result of their own decisions. This would have been the fiscally responsible thing for them to do, but they wouldn't have been able to 'blame the politicians' for their problems. Instead, they kept the expected rate almost 150% higher than what they knew they were getting in order to make sure the state was on the hook for more than they were.
To be clear, the state(the taxpayers) contributed more than 100% more to the pension fund in 2010 than the teachers union did. This is not the intent that the system was set up for, and the union is using a loophole to get the state to almost be completely responsible for the unions own pension. And they have the audacity to claim the sate is 'stealing' from them? This is pathetic behavior.
If you went to your mortgage company, and knew for a fact that you were only getting $1000 this month, but told them you would pay them $2000 at the end of the month, and then proceeded to tell them they were stealing money from you because you didn't pay what you agreed and they should make up the rest... What do you think a rational response to that behavior would be?
jesswiz
1:40 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim-
Thank you for clarifying. Yes, I'd agree that changing the expected rate to try and make up for bad investments was disingenuous on TRS's part. I'd agree that they shouldn't expect the state or taxpayers to make up the shortfall caused by poor investment.
The reference to "not being paid back", or if you are looking at the more inflammatory rhetoric out there "stealing from state worker pensions", is generated by the significant loans (yes, loans - not shortage of expected payment) that TRS has made to the State of Illinois to help with budget shortfalls in the state for nearly twenty years. Since TRS functions only to serve state employees and at the pleasure of our elected officials, there wasn't really an option to say "No, we won't lend you the money."
Every year, a percentage of each loan was paid back, but almost never all. Gradually, the remaining balance has become a hole that no one can see the bottom of.
I'm not advocating that we fill in the hole completely at once or at the taxpayers' expense. I just think it's a mistake to blame the shortfall on teachers themselves, or even unions which are set up to protect the right of workers to be heard.
Thank you for the taking the time to explain your comment. I appreciate the opportunity to engage in respectful debate with other stakeholders.
Tim
1:48 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
This will help clear up where the 'fault' lies.
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20111217/ISSUE01/312179972/pension-peril-illinois-trs-goes-higher-risk-with-investments
The teachers seem to think the public is stupid in the reasoning they are giving. If they would spend just a few minutes every day actually pouring over these financial statements, they could see for themselves what the union is doing to them(with their permission), instead of just repeating the phrases put out on a union supplied pamphlet.
The problems are complex, and the answers to them will be difficult. Passing the blame around is not going to solve any probems, and passing the funding off to the taxpayers for their own pension system is only going to hurt them in the long run when it comes time for building referendums. I can assure you they will all get shot down.
So, do the teachers REALLY care about the children? Or do they care about their unsustainable pension being paid for by the taxpayers? Right now, they are sending the taxpayers the message that they don't care at all about the children, and the taxpayers are starting to finally realize it.
jesswiz
2:14 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim-
Thanks for the article. It was definitely interesting reading. I think it makes a case for both of us. In your assertion that TRS is making risky (see: Poorly thought-out) choices in order to make up for investments losses, your article does well to support that claim. In fact, I don't disagree on that point at all.
But also contained in that same article is support for my assertion that this is not mainly the result of recent problems in the economy or poor investment strategy (although those things are certainly large factors now). This has been a problem for over 30 years, according to the article in Crains, because the state has not been paying in the share they agreed to for thirty years, making it nearly impossible for investments to pay off the way they should have. While this is an issue that is at the forefront in the media and taxpayers' minds NOW, this has been something that state workers have been trying for all those years to bring to light before it was too late. Unfortunately, the grasshoppers are controlling the money, and the worker ants are suffering for it.
Teachers are taxpayers as well. Middle and working class Joes and Jills who really DO care about whay they do and the children and community they do it for, otherwise, they wouldn't do it. Is it too much to ask that we pay them a living wage commensurate with the level of their required study? Or that we honor agreements made with them?
John Moreli
11:15 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Example Cicero politicians steal 30 million from Cicero Fire pension and only paid back 12 million! Why arent they paying it all back? All pension plans before the recession were 75-100% funded! The plans roll with the economy!
Educated
11:23 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Teachers, policeman, fireman, soldier are considered heros in our world until the bill comes to due to give them a living wage and a decent retirement. Illinios is a windfall state, so as a teacher you can not collect social security and a pension. A 401K has never been an option. Therefore, as teachers work decades in a low paying profession, educate 1000's of children, can not collect on a spouses benefits, the state aims to take away their pensions. As for the extreme salaries, that is a joke. People complain that a teacher who makes 70K year with 2 master degrees and 20 years experience is overpaid. Yet, a CEO in the U.S. has an average compensation of 5.4 million. (CHICAGO TRIBUNE MAY 2012). Governor Blago was a senator for 6 years and is entitled to a 60K year pension for life. Yes, I do make more than minimum wage. I need the money to pay back all of my student loans.
Stop blaming teachers for ruining the economic health of this state and country.
PAUL C.
11:35 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
We as tax payers pay for teachers to "teach" our children! Teachers need to worry about their retirement by funding their own 401K's etc. The insurance benefits let alone add to their cost of salary. I am all for taking the unions out of the picture. The right to work states like Indiana get it. Our taxes are high enough!
Sheila Raddatz
11:53 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Teachers are the unsung heros and the underdogs. They work all day and work into the night. No, they don't rescue people from burning buildings or stop bullets but they are the foundation for our children. Just because they don't carry an ax or a gun, it doesn't mean they don't deserve respect. The teachers are not the problem and constantly insulting teachers and jeopardizing their livelihood is counterproductive for everyone. It is time to look at who took allocated funds out of the political cookie jar and stop blaming the bakers.
Tim
12:09 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
When you look, you will find that the TRS itself is the one who took that money out of the jar. Again, nobody is accusing them of not doing their jobs day to day. They are simply calling for them to fund their own pensions. Bringing the contribution up to at least what the private sector pays (13%) and increasing the retirement age, would just about fully fund the system in a short time frame.
Just posting talking points from union pamphlets is not going to solve the problem.
At some point, those that collect the pensions are going to have to be expected to be the ones who fund it. Coming to the taxpayers to fund their pension is insane! No company that ever had a pension ever expected another company to contribute to its pension fund, and rightly so.
There is a reason private pensions have all but gone extinct. They were unsustainable debt loads for any company to hold over a long period of time. The switch to a more sustainable format was made long ago in the private sector, but the union has done everything in its power to prevent this change. For no other reason than 'this is the way its always been done'. That is not a reason, it is an excuse.
John Moreli
11:55 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
If it weren't for the Police and Fire we wouldn't have protection! If it weren't for Teachers we wouldn't be educated! I think part of their pay back is a pension! I pay my taxes too and have no problem paying for heir pensions! If you want to blame anyone! Blame the politicans, State and local government!
Tina
9:24 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
My husband is a teacher and we pay taxes,too.
Why do people forget that fact. My real estate bill is higher than it has ever been. We contribute to his pension and pay through our taxes.
I work in a middle school (not a teacher) and I would love to see all the complainers volunteer for just a day.
Tim
10:21 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Ill volunteer to work your job, when you volunteer to pay into my 401k.
Otherwise, do you own job, and pay into your own pension, and I will do my job, and pay into my retirement.
Where is this entitlement attitude coming from that everyone else should be paying into your retirement fund? Do you pay into mine?
John Moreli
12:11 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Sheila Raddatz I agree with you! The state and local government took money from our cookie jars and left us crumbs and will not put any cookies back! What a bunch of cookie monsters and they don't complain about their lucrative pensions!
mario
12:26 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Always seem to have the hands out when they want money and have their hands in their pockets when it is needed. In the real business world you do as your employer says and dont forget you have the right to leave. Unlike the business world, we cant get rid of those underperforming ones.
Jim W
8:05 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Mario,
Underperforming teachers can be fired, just like in any other job. Please don't spout nonsense without having facts or support to back it up. Please furnish the source of your information.
John Moreli
12:33 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Same goes for the private sector! Look at all the big CEO's that screw up companies and get huge buy outs and benefits totaling million and millions! Just look at the auto industry! I've seen and met a lot of jerks working in the private sector and they keep their jobs as a result of office politics!
John Moreli
12:34 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
How much in pension salary do you think the average teacher , Police or Firemen earn?
Tim
1:58 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
for teachers, it is well over 65K/yr
Ken
2:45 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim,
Are you saying that the AVERAGE salary for a teacher before they retire is over $90,000?
Tim
3:13 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Ken,
Median, not average.
There is a reason the union(and John) uses 'average' when they mention these figures. For being teachers, it is rather shameful that they have not been able to educate the population on something as simple as what the difference between median and average is. To then take advantage of people not knowing the difference, in an attempt to produce numbers that seem to be in their favor, is another bad mark against them. All of them.
Where are the teachers that have taken the time to read these financial statements, and come out against what the union is doing to them? Are they all so controlled as to just toe the union line, no matter what destruction it causes to the rest of the population?
http://www.conceptstew.co.uk/PAGES/mean_or_median.html
Marie
3:37 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim,
I'm curious what source you use to base your opinion on.
Can you post a link?
Tim
3:49 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Marie,
I certainly can provide a link;
Again, this article uses 'average', and it is STILL well above $65/yr. Median is even higher.
http://www.american.com/archive/2011/november/cadillac-pay-in-the-land-of-lincoln
"The 2010 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report in Illinois shows that the average benefit paid to a 60-year-old retired teacher with 35 to 39 years of service—a full working career—was $67,452. This is enough to provide a retirement income 50 percent higher than most Americans earn while they’re working."
Ken
7:21 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim,
You said that a teacher's pension is over $65,000 a year. According to oage 116 of this link, http://trs.illinois.gov/subsections/pubs/cafr/fy11/fy11cafr.pdf the average monthly benefit for a teacher with 20-24 years in 2011 was $2,989. About 1/2 of what you said.
This is the same source that is in the link you gave.
Ken
7:27 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Just to clarify, to get to the figure that you gave, that would be 35-39 years. It's listed as monthly benefit so that many not be the actual pension check but include the cost/value of healthcare.
Tim
10:18 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Ken, you keep saying the word average, and I am telling you what the mean is. Average, and mean are two different things.
The average takes all the numbers adds them up, and divides by the total amount.
The median is the middle score in a list of scores; it is the point at which half the scores are above and half the scores are below.
Do you understand now why the union gives you the average, and not the mean, when they tell you these figures? It is the method that hides the large pensions being paid out, whereas the mean will give the exact middle point from the lowest to the highest.
No wonder we have finally arrived here, it seems the teachers did a poor job educating the population in even basic math concepts.
mario
12:40 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Whos cares, they chose the profession. Dont like it dont be a part of it. And in regards to fireman, seriously like we needed that beautiful new firehouse. The real fireman are downtown risking their lives, all credits go to the emt's, they save lifes in the burbs
Jim W
8:08 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Good point. You chose your profession too and chose not to become a teacher. So, if you don't like your job, don't be a part of it. Furthermore, if you are envious of just how easy it is to be a teacher and how rich we get, quit your job and try it out for a while. See how long you last.
John Moreli
12:47 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
They reason they choose those professional is because they are brave and not like a lot of people like you are chicken and little babies to do that kind of work! I see to many idiots that sit behind a warm desk and safe environment and make 30,40 or 50,000 more than a police or firemen! So get real! As far as the firehouse they deserve them as they spend 24 hours there! What do you think they should have ? Barns like the old days!
Sheila Raddatz
12:57 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
But, if they chose the profession based on low pay and a pension and people lobby to take it away...then what? What caliber of an employee will you get when you expect a lot of education with no reward? We are not talking about retail positions with HS diplomas here. We are talking about educated professionals with many credit hours and degrees behind them.
mario
1:11 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
John, nice response. For your information I am 44 served in the Marine Corps and make a heela of a lot more than 50K over a policemans salary. My motivation for my success is because of eachers calling me a loser when I was younger so obviously I am a little jaded. I still feel we should be able to get rid of the non performers bu we can't. John keep going on the insults they make for a fun read.
John Moreli
1:28 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Let's see my wife worked for two major shipping agents and still works at one in the last thirty years! She will get two pensions , 401's , profit sharing, social security and will make more than the average teacher, Police and Firemans pension! Enough said!
concernedresident
1:22 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I hear a lot of comparisons to CEO's of major corporations and what they earn. That's apples to oranges, lets compare to the average middle class working stiff. Almost everyone has to get a masters nowadays to get a job so lets toss that out. Now, how many of those middle class working stiffs get a pension? How many actually have a company contribution to their 401K? Guess what, those of us who did put our money into those 401Ks over the past 30 years lost a lot of money! So why shouldn't you teachers be entitled to the same setback? We can blame the government all we want but the fact is the state is broke (as in poor and in the literal sense). We can't blame the current politicians alone because the wheels have been slowly coming off for years and years. Let's quit shedding those tears about teacher because we are all feeling the pain. Suck it up already.
Tina
9:17 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
You really think many middle class workers have a masters? You are joking,right?
Mike
12:35 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Less than 10% of the US population has a masters degree (7.95% as of 2011). That's "almost everyone?"
John Moreli
1:23 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Mario do you realize many many ex military become either a Police or fireman! Why is that?
By the way do you deserve to make that much more money than Police and Fireman or even a teacher? Please tell us what you do and let us judge?
mario
2:07 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
John, deserve has nothing to do with anything, This is America, the land of opportunity. I do sales, the ultimate pay for performance. As far as being judged that is for you to feel good not me. I am fine.
John Moreli
2:15 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Wow! Sales! I have done it before, got bored and have friends still doing it! It's a easy safe job and don't need much education to sell something!
mario
2:27 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
John, you conitnue to show your ignorance, I sell million dollar systems and I have a Masters degree . This is my last post because this is a waste of time, actually just you are; II'm tired. Not all of us have a wife to lean on as you obviously do. Have fun with that and be safe.
John Moreli
3:10 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Wow! I'm impressed! Not! I have a cousin that owns a multi million dollar a year bearing company with just a high school diploma! Big college degrees mean crap at times to work in sales! Have a sister in law that works in the telecommunication field and sells millions of dollars worth of a equipment and no college either! Now that's impressive! You know what a
master degree means? Plus I don't need my wife for monetary support , I was making I point ! I receive a nice pension ! Thank you!
Ken
1:44 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
And then we have Drew Peterson sitting in jail collecting over $72,000 a year in taxpayer money for his pension. Even if he's found guilty, he will continue to collect the pension (plus cost of living~ funny because there is no cost to live in prison) until he dies.
John Moreli
2:13 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Drew is now making 81,000 a year and it's going to care for all his children and bills!
John Moreli
2:19 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
11:15 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Example Cicero politicians steal 30 million from Cicero Fire pension and only paid back 12 million! Why arent they paying it all back? All pension plans before the recession were 75-100% funded! The plans roll with the economy!
John Moreli
4:03 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
By the way Mario I respect you and anyone that seved in the military including my father WWII . But I also put the Police and fireman in the same category as military and as heroes!
John Moreli
7:19 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Article XIV requires that Illinois voters be asked at least every 20 years if they desire a constitutional convention.[7] In 2008, the measure was also defeated by a wide margin,[9] 1,493,203 votes for and 3,062,724 against from a total of 5,539,172 votes cast. 983,245 voters chose neither option.[10] Pensions that are part of the Illinois constitution can't be changed for another sixteen years! Every twenty years is a convention and the last in 2008!
tom
7:50 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
To answer a previous question, the average pension for a teacher in IL for 2011 was $46,452.
John Moreli
7:55 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Wow! When politicians and town/city big shots get 110-125,000 a year pensions!
Barbara Palmer
10:04 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I discredit everything Tim writes because he believes that the pension system is run by a union. Which union would that be, Tim? His whole premise is preposterous and his sources are dubious. As a retired teacher I certainly wish I was getting $67,000 a year! TRS keeps all teachers, active and retired, well informed about their investments. They are not and never have been risky. I paid into my pension. I was promised by our Illinois Constitution
that I would receive it. I am sorry people lost on 401K's. However, I struggled on a small salary in a stressful job for years in return for a decent pension upon retirement. I will be 80 years old next month and now I have to worry about this? Perhaps I can save the state some money by just dying sooner rather than later.
Tim
10:13 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
And here is a perfect example of the teachers not even understanding their own system.
Barbara, YOU got to vote on who sits on the retirement system board of directors when you were a teacher. That means YOUR union voted to put these people there.
Think my sources are dubious, yet you provide no information to support that claim. Is the TRS itself a dubious source for this information?
http://trs.illinois.gov/subsections/trustees/board.htm
I think it speaks volumes to the problems that exist internally in the teachers union, that they do not even realize they vote to elect those on the board of their own pension system.
Get your own house in order, before you start demanding fixes for the problems you caused, from the taxpayers.
ibthinkin
10:38 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I Was Just Thinkin' Where is all the Money Going? In my household we are accountable for every dime........
Tina
10:50 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Tim,In reply to your comment,I'm not a teacher (said so in reply),so I do not get a pension. You evidently assume too many things.
You probably could not handle working as a teacher. Every volunteer that does come into the school is amazed at what the staff does and has to put up with.
You say you pay for your own retirement. What is your occupation? The public sector evidently never uses your services,product or pays you a penny. Because if they do,they are helping you pay for your retirement.
I do not have children in the public school,do you now or in the past? I'm helping to pay for their education and I do not compalin about that fact.
Maybe,you should become a teacher. You could set everyone straight.
Tim
11:06 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
It really is neat to hear you talk about how hard and important the job is. Really, it is.
Would you like to actually address the reality of the fiscal problems that exist now?
Or even better, would you like to start paying into my retirement fund ABOVE what you claim are the services I get from the public sector. I already pay for those services, as you noted. So, obviously, you should be obligated to pay into my retirement now? What I have no intention for paying for is the extra retirement funding needed to keep a pension fund solvent that the majority of those saving it from ruin will never collect from.
And what are the teachers unions protesting?
Oh, they are just protesting a SLIGHT increase (that would still be less than what the private sector pays into SS) in the amount they would contribute into their own pension that they will be collecting from. They somehow think this is unacceptable, and that these funds should come out of my wallet instead. They are literally protesting to take your money from you.
I mentioned earlier, they have been warned for decades about the structural fiscal problem they were causing. And they fought tooth and nail from being responsible for fixing it. Now that it's finally broken...ooops... "hey, mr average joe, why don't you pay to fix it?" The answer is 'No'.
villerome
11:14 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
www.illinoisloop.org/salary
So if a husband and wife both teaching in a good district sit around in summer to realize that when they both retire from there 9 month a year job that pays them 100k each they will retire with about 160,000 a year...now show me a normal husband and wife that put only 9% of there pay in a 401k that will get that sort of return.Its not so much the teachers pay that is upsetting it the administrators in there 40's and 50's already making well over 100k each how is someone worth that?Cut the administrators pay and hire more teachers that actual do something.I do believe there are a lot of good teachers but I think 65 to 80k should be the most they get paid.especially when you figure the pension your going to get.I know theirs lots of teachers that get way under paid but I'm talking about the good districts with high taxes.I don't mean to offend anyone but use your head when figuring these administrators pay
tommy d
11:24 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
http://www.illinoisloop.org/salary.html
Tim
11:29 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
It is not the teachers pay that is in question.
It is their ability to accept the responsibility to pay in to the system themselves, and not expect taxpayers to bear the majority of the funding burden.
Does anyone actually know what they are protesting?
They are protesting getting only 3.0%, instead of 3.5% raises each year in retirement. That's right. a 0.5% change.
At a 60K pension, that adds up to a difference in their retirement checks of $25 PER MONTH. Instead of getting $5175 dollars/mo in their next year of retirement, they would only get $5150/mo. How horribly unfair.
They are protesting the raising of the full retirement age to 67(the private sector is 69, by the way).
Take a careful look at what it is they are doing here. Do they not understand how selfish they look? They are actually protesting something that gives them a slightly lower raise every year.
Ken
6:47 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Tim,
You keep saying a $65,000+ pension. Please show us the data where you're getting this from.
I understand the difference between "mean" and "average" but I'd like to see the raw numbers that you are using to get to the $65,000 figure you keep throwing around.
When you use that amount, are you talking pension check or total benefits?
Sheila Raddatz
9:16 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Half the teachers quit within 5 years because of the demands, the low pay and the ridicule. I wonder what the studies show after this initial glut of retirees hit....
Tim
9:52 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
How many times does the union need to lie to you before you understand what they are doing?
(the numbers you are quoting are from a union study)
http://modeducation.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-50-of-teachers-really-quit-within-5.html
"the most recent estimates from the TFS (2008-09) find that the raw leaving rate among teachers with 1-3 years of experience is about nine percent, while the rate for teachers with 4-9 years is around eight percent."
Do teachers not realize what the internet is used for, or do they just count on people being too lazy to check whether what they are saying is true?
Sheila Raddatz
10:18 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Tim, you are going to trust a website (and its writings) when they won't even pay the $10 a year for their own domain name? Now that is funny.
Tim
10:24 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
What is funny is that you did not even read the report that was linked there. If such things as a domain name concern you(which has absolutely zero to do with the report), then you can read it right from the source;
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010353.pdf
When you stop trying to use distractions and personal attacks on the messengers, perhaps one day you will get down to the actual data that people are trying to give you.
John Moreli
9:26 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Hello everyone ! I don't see anyone complaining that their tax dollars that they paid year after year after year for pension plans was not placed into the plans by the State or their local community! Why are the tax payeers just complaining about the unions, start knocking on the doors of the State or your town government and ask what they did with the money meant for pension plans that was collected by your tax dollars! Thats were the problem starts!
John Moreli
11:17 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Here's the blame for the pension failures! The dam politicians!
http://media.apps.chicagotribune.com/pensions/index.html
my opinion
12:50 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
They (the politicians) did the same thing with social security. Took the money out of the cookie jar and threw in IOU's. Now both the pensions and social security are trying to cash in the IOU's.
Its that simple......if the state had funded the pensions a little each year like they should have instead of writing the IOU's, we wouldn't have this problem. But just as they are doing now with the federal debt they are just kicking the can down the road for our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren to pay.
Tim
2:29 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
By that logic, we should have the teachers union pay to make SS solvent. All this talk about 'fairness' and all.
Jim W
4:27 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
@Tim, I did pay into SS for over ten years (the minimum needed to qualify), and many other teachers have too, and none of us will ever be able to collect on what we earned. How is that for fairness? So, I guess many of us have already done what you are asking. You're welcome.
Tim
6:02 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
If you did what I was asking, SS wouldn't be in trouble along with your pension is. Since you didn't fund it to 100% even though you wont be collecting on it, the regular taxpayers are now entitled to claim you 'stole it' from them.
SS is short, and so is your pension. Nobody is asking you to fund SS to full funding knowing you won't collect on it. Why are you asking someone to fund your pension, knowing they won't collect on it?
Unions have more than likely been busted in your lifetime(under Regan), I'm not sure why the teachers union is so confident it won't happen to them. I have found ZERO people out of those I talk to about this issue that support what the teachers union is doing.... except for teachers. I don't think they realize yet how close they are to REAL problems. The shortsightedness of what they are doing should be obvious, but all they see is their own little world, and the check they want to get. These are 'heros'? They sure aren't acting like it.
Susan Carroll
2:07 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Every time I read about how cushy and luxurious the life of a teacher is, I wonder why everyone isn't trying to become one.
John Moreli
2:56 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Just like a teacher! I don't see anyone here trying to become a Police or Fireman! ! All people know how to do here is to rip them a new a-- hole and preach that they don't anything or deserve the salaries they get!
tom
4:56 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Tim,
Is there a reason that you haven't posted the link(s) for the data that you used to conclude that the average or mean pension is over $65,000?
Tim
5:54 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
No.
Is there a reason you didn't find where it was already posted?
I'm not your hand-holder. If you want the information, again, either find the first time it was posted, or look it up on your own. You obviously own a computer with a web browser, so navigate over to google.com and go nuts.
John Moreli
7:20 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
I guess there's double standards Tim! Why don't you grow up! You are telling Tom to look up something for himself as he wants to see proof of something you posted ! I believe you asked me numerous times to show proof when I commented on an article and you insisted to see my proof and I refused!
tom
8:55 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Tim,
I did find the information but it's NOT $65,000 like you say it is. It's $46,452. That's why I'm asking you for the link to the information that you are using to say it's $20,000 more than it actually is.
http://trs.illinois.gov/subsections/pubs/cafr/fy11/fy11cafr.pdf
David
12:26 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
you might want to read about all the nice loans to the Stephens groups in Rosemont, IL...... research those loans
AL
2:19 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I would love to have retired after 30 years received 75% of what my average salary was for the last 3 years then being young enough to find another job worked for another 10 years and receive a pension from another group. Then fully retire and have same income as if I were working with increases to my pension every year. But I was not smart enough to think of this when I was younger. My own fault but was happy in the job I had
Jason
5:52 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Tim, the only thing I'd like to add and have you remember is that teachers are state employees. Teachers pay something like 9.75% of their salary to TRS every paycheck for those 34-39 years. Teachers depend on TRS to make wise investments. The problem is that the State agreed to give state employees, not just teachers, guaranteed benefit pensions. The fault lies with the State, not the teachers. I don't know what the State is going to do, but I still don't see what teachers have done to deserve the blame that lots of people ascribe to them for the financial mess in Springfield.
Tim
9:52 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
No Jason, they don't pay that.
The D202 Board of Education, and D308(your property taxes) pay that 9.4% contribution to TRS, not a single cent comes out of the teachers listed salary for that. It is a union negotiated 'benefit' listed right in the labor contract. 64% of school districts in Illinois have this extra 'benefit'.
For D202
http://www.psd202.org/Departments/AP/APT_Contract.pdf
Page 28.
Section 11.12
Although designated by the Illinois Pension Code as teacher contributions, the amounts herein required to be contributed by the Board are being paid by the Board in lieu of contributions by the employee.
For D308 (the board also pays their Health insurance costs)
http://76.227.214.198/assets/5/employment/contract_teacher.pdf
Page 32.
The Board shall contribute the 9.40% towards each teacher’s mandated (9.40%)
contribution to TRS for teachers’ retirement and .80% towards the teacher’s’ mandated (.80%) THIS contribution to TRS for teachers’ health insurance for the duration of this contract.
my conscience
9:41 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
I suppose an even sweeter pension deal might be had by a State of Illinois politician.
Let’s say are lucky enough to get elected to a state representative position, then you can contribute 11.5 percent of your $68000 annual salary and after just two 2-year terms in office you are vested into a lucrative state retirement program.
You would have paid-in only about $16000 total, but would be eligible to receive a pension of 12 percent of your salary, along with 3 percent increases if retiring after age 60!
And that pension payout increases to 27 percent of salary after eight years of in office, 45 percent after 12 years of service and finally the maximum 85 percent after 20 years!!
I don’t know any private sector job that would fund someone’s retirement like that after just four years of work. (I also doubt any self-employed person would have such a successful 401k.)
This is just an example of the General Assembly Retirement System of Illinois, and why we are in such a predicament financially. So, when we are passing the blame around let’s not forget the politicians.