patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Plainfield School District's 20 Highest-Paid Administrators

Information on district administrators is public record and must be submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education and posted on the District 202 website.

 

Editor's note: We post this information because we know it is of interest to our readers, the taxpayers, whose property taxes are the largest source of income for the school district. 

Want Plainfield news delivered free to your inbox? Sign up for the Plainfield Patch newsletter.

Follow the links below for a detailed look into each school district’s administrators’ compensation packages. The information is what was provided to employees in the past full year. 

School districts are required by law to post, each year, itemized salary compensation reports for “every employee in the district holding an administrative certificate and working in that capacity" on or before Oct. 1.

The reports must include base salary, bonuses, pension contributions, retirement increases, cost of health and life insurance, sick- and vacation-day payouts, annuities and any other compensation. 

Most of the salary information listed below was reported to the Illinois State Board of Education for 2012 by District 202. Salary information for employees with asterisks (*) next to their names was obtained by filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request due to staffing changes that meant their current positions or salaries were not reflected in the ISBE report.

Name Title Base salary Other benefits Total
John Harper Superintendent $270,446.33 $49,007.46 $319,453.79
Mark Heiss Director of Administration and Personnel - Elementary School $129,122.4 $34,192.33 $163,314.73
Robert Smith Principal - Plainfield Central High School $128,528.4 $34,167.42 $162,695.82
Craig Brown Director of Administration and Personnel - High School $127,372.63 $33,987.09 $161,359.72
Kathleen Baxter Principal - Crystal Lawns Elementary School $126,367.88 $23,409.44 $149,777.32
Anthony Manville Principal - Plainfield East High School $125,395.4 $33,799.5 $159,194.9
Mina Griffith Assistant Superintendent for Student Services $124,704.01 $33,718.3 $158,422.31
Glenn A. Wood* Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction $122,831.80 $37,326.33 $160,158.12
Daniel C. Thorse* Assistant Superintendent for Administration and Personnel $122,831.80 $37,326.33 $160,158.12
Christian Rivara Principal - Indian Trail Middle School $122,808.40 $33,495.64 $156,304.04
Angela Smith* Assistant Superintendent - Business and Operations $120,469.65 $37,081.25 $157,550.90
Linda Casey Director of Instructional Technology and Media $120,378.20 $33,180.35 $153,558.55
Raymond Epperson Principal - Plainfield North High School $119,353 $33,089.75 $152,442.75
David Travis Principal - Plainfield South High School $119,353 $33,089.75 $152,442.75
Joan Woolwine Director of Curriculum and Instruction - Elementary/Middle School $119,049.60 $33,024.60 $152,074.20
Tod Schnowske Principal - Plainfield Academy $116,890.80 $32,800.65 $149,691.45
Stephen E. Diveley Principal - Heritage Grove Middle School $114,038.6 $32,465.58 $146,504.18
Patrick E. Flynn Principal - Drauden Point Middle School $114,038.6 $32,465.58 $146,504.18
Sharon Alexander Principal - Aux Sable Middle School $111,259.20 $32,139.20 $143,398.47
Ernestine Radomsky* Director of English Language Learners $108,667.30 $34,656.72 $143,324.02

Due to some staffing changes, some of the highest-paid administrators, as reported to ISBE, are no longer with the district. The following staffers are included in the ISBE report but have been replaced by lower-paid staff, according to the district, resulting in a monetary savings:

  • Former Assistant Superintendent of Business and Operations John Prince (replaced by Angela Smith), base salary $181,268
  • Former Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Carmen Ayala (replaced by Glenn Wood), base salary $159,755.20
  • Former Director of English Language Learners Linda Hoste (replaced by Ernestine Radomsky), base salary $156,755.20
  • Former Assistant Superintendent for Administration and Personnel Darlene von Behren (replaced by Dan Thorse), base salary $156,755.20.

By hiring those staffers' replacements at a lower salary, the district will save about $158,000 in salary costs, according to district officials, which will offset the cost of hiring an associate superintendent. Former Plainfield Central High School Principal Lane Abrell was hired in December to serve as the associate superintendent for the 2013-2014 school year, making a base salary of $168,000.

He will become superintendent after John Harper retires in July 2014; at that point, his base salary will jump to $205,000.

Related Topics: Highest Paid Administrators, Plainfield School District, administrator salaries, and district 202

Mark

7:05 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I think we need to raise taxes so these folks can get a raise. Don't forget their pensions haven't been improved for quite a while. I work in the private sector and have not had a raise in five years now, pensions went out years ago replaced with a 401k.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roll Tide

11:11 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Please remember, educators do not receive social security.

Plainfield Resident

7:26 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

This is disgusting! Perhaps we should cut salaries of these people and apply the cuts to the education of our children. PSD in a deficit? Gee, I wonder why! I see they are all well compensated, but our children suffer as we continually cut programs. What is wrong with this picture?!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Another Plainfeld Resident

9:26 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Lets not forgot they get three months vacation in the summer....

Comment_arrow

Kristine Neumann

11:52 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Another Plainfield Resident: They get a lot more than 3 months vacation. How about the time they just had off for Christmas break? How about spring break? How about MLK b-day? President's Day? I could go on, but you get the picture. These salaries are way out of whack & yet nothing is done & the taxpayer is on the hook.

Comment_arrow

some guy

12:55 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Why is this disgusting? Because they make more than you or me? Because you think you work harder than them? Please explain. They went to college, chose to go into education, worked up the ladder, and now have good paying jobs. For that they should have their salaries cut? Two kids have jobs after school. One works at McDonald's making $9/hr. The other works at Chili's as a server making $6/hr plus tips. Both work equally hard but the Chili's kid makes $100 each shift in tips, thus making a lot more money than the McDonald's worker. Anyone demanding that the Chili's worker take a cut in salary? I don't think so. You made a choice not to go into education...don't demand our educators salaries get cut because you think they make a lot of money.

Comment_arrow

Nicole

10:36 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

All of these people are Administrators and are 12 month employees....they don't get summers off. They get vacation days like other corporate employees. They get Christmas Eve and day off, then work 10 hour days the rest of "Christmas break." I agree they make a lot of money, but with money comes major responsibility, I wouldn't want it!

Vera

7:51 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Shannon - Harper's salary is wrong. His true compensation was $313,588 in 2009. That includes the $10,000 in unused vacation time.
You need to FOIA the checks issued to him by the district for unused vacation time to get his true compensation for fiscal last year. For this year, you have to wait until June to get his true compensation. By the time he retires in June 2014, he will be making 342,000. The district does not post unused vacation time and doesn't have to because in October he has not cashed in any of that time. But for the readers, you can find out what he cashed in last year and get his true compensation. Good luck!

Reply

Vera

8:21 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Harper can be paid for 20 unused vacation days in the last three years of his contract. In total, Harper is expected to received about $91,938 for unused vaction days in his last five years with the district. Bottom line: His total expected earnings for 2012-13 is $330,344 and $342,675 for 2013-14.

Reply

Truth

1:12 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

He can retire and collect his pension and still work in another school district.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Debra

10:30 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

"Truth", by law, retired educators can only work a maximum of 100 days in any state certificated position or they lose their pension. You must be thinking of our Legislature!

Jon

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I don't see a problem with administrators salaries. Dr. Harper, is most likely underpaid. He has been with the district for a long time (I know a lot of my friends me included had him as a middle school teacher) and if he was with a company in the private sector for the same length of time with a Doctorate degree, and worked his way up to CEO he would probably be making millions. As for unused vacation days, exactly UNUSED, most state and fed employees get this as well.
I don't agree with a lot of cuts in the classroom level, I also don't agree with teaching kids in a second language when it is not an option for my child to learn a second language at school, etc. etc.
What I do know us my child attends Plainfield Schools, what she doesn't learn there we teach her at home. You pay very little for your child to attend public school, compare the cost to private schools in the area. If you don't want to contribute to your administrators salary or teachers salary, Move.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa S.

9:54 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Actually, I could send my kids to private school quite comfortably for what I pay in taxes to the school district every year.

And what you fail to recognize is that not everyone is as lucky as you to be able to provide additional education at home or the time to spend doing it.

Some other guy

6:23 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

These folks don't have the same 10 month contract that teachers do. Most, if not all of them, have 12 month contracts. some guy has the correct perspective on the situation.

Reply

Debra

10:15 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

"Some Guy" is absolutely correct! The salaries listed above are certainly not out of line with neighboring school districts, in fact, many of the salaries are lower by comparison, especially with a school district of this size and growth! These administrators have spent huge amounts of personal time and money educating themselves with Master's Degrees and Doctorates in the field of education, so they can be the best and the brightest in order to guide their teaching staff. Plainfield School District 202 is excellent, and many of us live here because of District 202's reputation. High-performing schools do not just happen...it takes a great deal of concerted effort and commitment from the Administration and teaching staff. They earn their pay! The administrators listed, work 12 months a year, not ten months. It is a seven day a week job, not five, and certainly does not end at 4pm! I often see office lights on at 9 or 10pm at night in the Admin. building and schools! They do get some vacation time, which in Mr. Harper's case and most others, was rarely used because, I suspect, there's so much work to do. It is wonderful to see people dedicating their entire lives and careers to their students and community! Make no mistake, all of these people could go north on Rt. 59, and make far more money, but chose to stay for less pay! Bravo! Keep up the good work of educating our children!

Reply

Gina

11:04 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

These are hard working people who deserve what they are paid. One of the biggest issues America faces is the lack of reform in our education system without changes-- and great people-- who are employed and paid like CEOS-- we have a bleak future generation. Teachers/ administrators/ educators need to be paid more across the board as we need to keep good people to elevate our education system. Paying them less is an ignorant thing to say. We need to attract TALENT and the best and the brightest to encourage education and eduction reform. Kudos to all of them!

Reply

Roll Tide

11:28 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

First of all, I question the purpose of this article; to inform, or inflame? Secondly, take a look at salaries and benefits of upper level admins in neighboring districts and you'll discover that 202 salaries are on the lower end. Remember, this is a district of 30,000 students and a few thousand employees. It takes talented, hard-working and well-educated professionals to lead this district, and they need to be compensated.

Reply

Vera

5:17 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

It's very true that Dr. Harper doesn't take vacation. That's why to a 5-2 board vote, the board agreed on a contract that gave him these hidden bonuses by giving him additional vacation days that were meant to be cashed in at the end of the fiscal year while touting he was freezing his salary for one year. Bottom line: His base pay remained low but his true compensation pushed him in the top 20 of the highest paying superintendents in the state.
If you agree that he deserves this pay - good for you. But do you as a taxpayer deserved to be deceived on the true amount?

Reply
Comment_arrow

I. J.

8:05 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

Most if not all professional jobs include some type of holiday and/or vacation package as a benefit. He could have used it or saved it up. He choose to work rather than take the time off and bank the money for his last year. It was already figured in. How would you compensate him for the unused time?

Comment_arrow

Debra

10:42 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

Although I do not know Dr. Harper personally, I do know he serves as head of the 2nd largest school district in the State of Illinois outside the Chicago area. (Chicago School Administrative salaries are not included in the ranking of top Administrative salaries). Only Elgin S.D. U-46 is larger than Plainfield. I would certainly hope, if not expect his salary to be in the top 20 highest paid in the state. Responsibility-wise his salary should rank the 2nd highest in the state, not just in the top 20. It's good to see our School Board recognizes the tremendous amount of effort it has taken on the part of the administrative and teaching staff in order to orchestrate the smooth transition of adding numerous schools needed to accommodate growth. Good job Plainfield!

Vera

10:56 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

I believe Dr. Harper should be compensated for the additional unused vacation days set aside for him because he didn't take vacation in his earlier years as superintendent.
I'm just asking for the district to be more upfront and honest. I am uncomfortable with the fact that the district doesn't update its compensation chart in June to show Harper's true salary. The district isn't required to update Harper's salary when the district writes him a big check in June for unused vacation so they don't. They know that the information on their website about his compensation is wrong and misleading. In the last three years of his contract, he can be paid for 20 unused vacation days - that's more than $20,000 - because he makes more than $1,000 a day.
It would be nice if the school board was upfront and honest with how much he is making instead of misleading the taxpayers. They could ask district staff to update the numbers when Harper gets paid for his unused vacation days so taxpayers know what he received in pay and benefits.

Reply

Janey Bird

12:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

For the person who mentioned teacher's holidays and vacations.... we are not paid on those days... we only get paid for the approx 180 days we work....all holidays and winter breaks, spring breaks, etc are unpaid.....

Reply

kim vaccariello

9:56 pm on Tuesday, April 2, 2013

I think we should be more concerned with the Federally regulated and mandatory Common Core Curriculum that is going to cost our district a huge expense to impliment. If you are not familiar with the new Common Core Curriculum, please do so.

Reply

Leave a comment