Gun-Control Laws Better Than Executive Order: Durbin

While visiting Fox Valley, senator says gun control is only part of the solution to mass violence.

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin said Friday that he would rather see Congress arrive at a “sensible solution” on curbing gun violence than see the president issue some kind of executive order attempting to remedy the problem.

Still, in light of the power wielded by the NRA and the gun industry, which many congressmen will not stand up to, Durbin said he would support President Barack Obama if he does issue executive orders in an attempt to rein in gun violence. “Whatever it takes to keep our streets and schools safe, I’ll support,” he said.

“But I hope that we could do it in the the normal congressional process,” he added. “I know that it’s tough. I know the politics on this issue very, very well, and I know some of my colleagues are not prepared to deliver.”

Earlier this week, Vice President Joe Biden said the president is considering executive orders to in an effort to halt shootings like the one at Sandy Hook School in Newtown, Conn., CNN reported earlier this week. The bloody massacre of 20 children and seven adults renewed attention on the gun-control debate. Last month, Obama said a new task force headed by Biden would return by the end of January with some solid recommendations for combatting the violence.

While Biden is talking executive orders, Durbin, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he believe a legislative solution is more appropriate and said there are options being floated in Washington that, “from the details I’m hearing, I think I can support.”

Durbin stopped in the Fox Valley on Friday to review Elgin Community College’s efforts to reduce student indebtedness. Also on Friday, he visited Rockford, where he met with law enforcement leaders to discuss the strategies being used there to reduce violent crime and prevent mass shootings in the area. The senator is visiting several communities where he has been hosting “listening sessions” to learn what law enforcement and residents believe needs to be done on the issue.

The ideas he has been gathering from those sessions include:

  • Gun control is not enough: Congress must pass legislation to combat mass shootings like the one at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, but gun-control alone is not the solution. There are a variety of issues that come into play with the kind of violence that occurred at Newtown and at other communities, including mental health issues.
  • Tougher state gun laws: There already are stringent federal laws in place related to gun violence, and Durbin said that states likewise need tougher laws. Criminals, he said, generally fear federal prosecution on weapons charges because the penalties are so much more severe than state laws.

In that regard, Durbin said, the people need to begin hearing more from law enforcement and sportsmen — “people who use guns legally and responsibly, they need to speak out,” he said.

Durbin said he would support an assault rifle ban, as well as a ban on the large clips for such weapons. Some clips designed for assault rifles can hold 100 rounds of ammunition. Most sportsmen would agree, he said, that no hunter needs to have an assault rifle with an extended clip.

In addition, he said that on Thursday, a gangbanger in Chicago tried to use an Uzi against a police officer, but the weapon jammed on the first shot. The clip, he said, held 31 more rounds. Those types of weapons and those types of clips do not need to be on the streets, except in the hands of law enforcement or the military.

  • Background checks: He said background checks are needed on every gun buyer, yet 40 percent of guns sold in the United States are sold at gun shows where there background checks are not conducted. That’s a significant loophole in a law intended to prevent the sale of firearms to felons. But someone with mental illness also could take advantage of these unregulated sales.
  • Crack down on straw purchasers: Durbin said straw purchases legally can buy larges numbers of guns but then turn around and sell them individually with no oversight to ward against felons or the mentally ill making purchases. That, Durbin said, should be a serious felony carrying heavy penalties.
  • Educating ex-offenders: In terms recidivism among prison inmates, Durbin said educational opportunities are needed to help ensure they will have a better shot at finding a job when they leave prison, rather than returning to crime when they cannot find work. He said some are illiterate.

Let Patch save you time. Have local stories delivered directly to your inbox with our free newsletter. Fast signup here.

Then like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter at @PlainfieldPatch.

Buster 26 January 13, 2013 at 12:04 AM
I am a police officer in "Little Chicago". I feel that the sentencing for offenses of violence need to be severe enough to prevent reoccurrence. I have arrested several thugs with guns and assault weapons and the sentences imposed upon conviction were laughable. There has to be severe consequences for commiting gun related crimes. How about a mandatory 10 year gun specification when a gun is used to commit an offense of violence. I want to be clear that the criminally insane don't give two shits about going to prison or a death sentence. You can pass all of the feel good legislation you want but at the end of the day the only thing that will stop them is a committed adversary. Whether it be a police officer, security guard or CCW holder. Punishing law abiding Americans by restricting what they can and can't buy won't do anything to prevent criminals and psychopaths from using weapons for violence. The officers I work with put their lives on the line everyday and arrest lots of people. Most of the people arrested for offenses of violence are repeat offenders that we know by name. Don't tell me how we need to educate and rehabilitate. WE NEED TO INCARCERATE!!!
John January 13, 2013 at 04:12 PM
Well said Buster. A gun is only a tool. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to design alternative methods to commit mass murder, it just takes a narrow mind to think restricting gun ownership will prevent it.
Tony Filippelli January 13, 2013 at 07:29 PM
Hey Buster, Great Post!! I wish these politicians would actually listen to the officers on the front lines, like yourself.
barbyumi January 14, 2013 at 08:12 PM
Buster 26, more true words could not have been spoken - the problem is not more control of guns, it is more control of our courts, and the criminals who fill them! We need to restore the death penalty here in Illinois for obvious, and heinous crimes as the one committed here in Joliet by the four animals in custody!
Lisa S. January 14, 2013 at 09:48 PM
Is Dick Durbin really not aware that the City of Chicago has some of the most stringent laws in the country regarding guns...and nearly the highest murder rate. Coincidence? As for "John Tips"...really? Yes...legals cocaine foreveryone will certainly solve the problem. Not closing and securing our borders (where most of the drugs are coming in), and deporting illegals with illegal weapons who traffic them.? Take a look south and see the havoc that those gangs and drugs have brought to Mexico. Liberal America thinks that only the wonderful people who want a better life are coming here and should be welcomed with open arms. The 'bad' people are coming too because of the money to be made and we are all just willing targets. .


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »