.

Plainfield Mayor Race: Collins Will Stay on April 9 Ballot; Lambert Loses Election Challenge

Hearings held Friday at Village Hall had two very different outcomes.

Voters will have only one box to check for village president this spring.

On Friday, incumbent Mayor Michael Collins won his fight to stay on the April 9 ballot — but his challenger, Michael Lambert, wasn’t as fortunate.

Despite the support of electoral board chairman Paul Fay, Lambert lost his bid to stay on the ballot after Plainfield resident Jeffrey Schmitt filed an objection claiming Lambert didn’t have enough valid signatures on his nominating petitions.

At a Friday morning hearing, Plainfield resident John Ledvina — who hopes to run as a write-in Republican candidate for the mayor’s seat — was unsuccessful at ousting Collins from the ballot.

Get Plainfield news delivered straight to your inbox - sign up for the free Patch newsletter.

In a petition filed Jan. 3, Ledvina maintained that the form used by Collins when he filed his nominating papers is flawed and does not comply with the Illinois election code. According to Ledvina, the statement of candidacy is missing language affirming that the candidate is “personally known to” the person who certified the form.

Attorney Kathleen Konicki represented Ledvina, arguing that “the law is quite clear” in specifying that the language must be present.

The form, which was part of the 2013 Candidate Guide made available by the Will County Clerk’s office and the State Board of Elections, “is flawed, and it’s being challenged,” Konicki said.

Collins pointed out that the same form has been used by virtually every local candidate since 2007 — including Konicki, who served as a Will County Board member for 16 years.

“The form will work fine for you until it is challenged,” Konicki acknowledged. “I guess I was fortunate, as you have been fortunate in your prior runs for office, that it hasn’t been challenged.”

In the end, an electoral board made up of trustees Paul Fay (chairman) and Jim Racich and village clerk Michelle Gibas, sided with Collins, who pointed out that Illinois statute states that nominating petitions must be submitted “substantially” as the code stipulates.

“I think that I have, as well as every other candidate that’s filed for office since 2007, has done what Springfield wants us to do,” Collins said. “ … Is this document substantially what the legislature wants? Yes, it is.”

Fay agreed.

“I am of the opinion that Michael Collins has demonstrated substantial compliance with the law,” he said. “I think if Illinois was more concerned with stating that ‘this person is known to me,’ they would have included it on the form.”

Ledvina said he was disappointed in the board’s decision, adding that he believes his objection had merit.

“I don’t think it’s a loophole,” he said of the rule stipulating that the statement of candidacy must include the “personally known to me” language. He noted that a similar case in Calument City ended with a candidate being removed from the ballot — but that decision is being appealed.

Ledvina said he filed Dec. 21, 2012, to potentially run as a Republican write-in candidate for village president.

The deadline to file nominating petitions to appear on the ballot was Dec. 26, but Ledvina said it was important to him to run as a Republican. That won’t happen unless local Republicans hold a primary to nominate candidates.

“I’m a proud Republican and I want people to know,” he said, adding that currently, the Republicans have no plans to hold a primary. “I think I threw them for a loop with my filing.”

Lambert off the ballot

Meanwhile, the electoral board voted 2-1 to sustain Schmitt’s objections against Lambert.

Represented by Joliet attorney Richard Kavanagh, Schmitt successfully argued that Lambert didn’t have the required 104 valid signatures, citing various reasons, including the fact that some individuals who signed were not registered voters at the address they listed, and that others either printed instead of signed their names or did not sign their own names.

“There are almost 30 signatures that we feel are not valid,” Kavanagh said, offering documents from the Will County Clerk’s office showing that those who signed were either not registered voters, or that their official signature did not match the printed signatures on the petition form. Others who signed the forms did not list their correct addresses, he said.

For his part, Lambert offered affidavits from many of those who signed his petitions in which they attested to being registered voters or noted their correct addresses. He also argued that in the digital age, a name doesn’t need to be signed, or written in cursive, to be valid.

“There’s a lot of different marks and signatures that pass for someone’s legal entity,” he said.

Lambert said he was willing to strike several signatures for which he was unable to obtain affidavits, but said that still left him with 105 valid signatures.

Fay voiced his support for Lambert, but fellow electoral board members Gibas and Racich did not agree.

“I know Mr. Lambert has the greatest of intentions,” Racich said, but added he did not believe the affidavits could not make up for some of the inconsistencies, such as the incorrect addresses.

Gibas said that even if she were to agree that the printed names are valid, “what I can’t look past is the ‘not registered at address shown.’”

“I was disappointed in Mr. Fay’s response,” Schmitt said following Friday’s hearing, but noted that he was not surprised that the electoral board ultimately sided with him.

According to Schmitt, who said he doesn’t know Lambert, he didn’t file his objections out of malice.

“It’s nothing personal,” he said.

“I would hope that Mr. Schmitt would get involved in the actual process rather than trying to discourage people from getting involved,” Lambert said.

This is the second time Schmitt has objected to a village candidate’s nominating petitions. In 2009, he was successful in getting village trustee candidate Jesse Maggitt removed from the ballot.

A second challenge by Schmitt against trustee candidate Michael Guinta was taken off Friday's agenda after Guinta dropped out of the race.

READ: CANDIDATE WITHDRAWS FROM PLAINFIELD VILLAGE BOARD RACE

---------------

Follow Plainfield Patch on Facebook.

park junkie January 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM
Minnie, I don't think someone who cannot fill out simple paperwork correctly or one who breaks the law in attempts to get on the ballot should be running for any office. What kind of an example do they set for the community? "Elect me even though I do not follow the law to get on the ballot!" Not a very good campaign slogan... It's too bad Mr. Lambert did not bother getting many more than the required amount of signatures. From what i hear he also had issues with a circulator possibly not appearing in front of a notary. This is despicable! I heard your husband did not even write what office he was running for on his petition pages! Is this true? If so, then he might want to fill out his paperwork properly and complete if he wants to run for office. Shame on him!
park junkie January 23, 2013 at 12:45 AM
Town, The electoral board is prescribed by illinois state statute. If it is a village or city election and there is an objection, the clerk, mayor, and senior trustee/councilman/alderman preside on the electoral board. The only time there is a substitute is the person designated is running for an office related to the objection. This is why Trustee Racich presided vs. Mayor Collins. Please take off your tinfoil hat!
park junkie January 23, 2013 at 12:45 AM
good! get out!
Buckgrove January 23, 2013 at 12:56 AM
Maybe the patch can do an article on Mr. Schmitt?
Manley Tyson January 24, 2013 at 11:51 PM
I agree! They should also do en expose on how Michael Lambert threatened to sue Plainfield Township when they would not award him a no bid contract for the new senior senter. What a bully!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »