.
Feedback

Curtains Closed on 'Rent'? School Board Stands by Plainfield Central Administrators

District Supt. John Harper and board of education president Roger Bonuchi said they respect PCHS administrators' decision to halt production on student version of the Broadway musical.

Emphasizing the play's themes of love, tolerance and acceptance, several students and supportive friends and family members pleaded their case to the Plainfield School District 202 school board on Tuesday, asking officials to overturn a decision by administrators to nix a spring performance of the musical "Rent."

Students had hoped to perform a "school edition" of the play that they acknowledged is edgy, but said is a toned-down version of the Tony Award-winning original.

READ: Students Fight Back After School Shuts Down 'Rent'

In the end, district administrators praised their passionate speeches, but sided with Plainfield High School – Central Campus administrators, who rejected plans to stage the show.

Plainfield Central students told the school board they learned late last week that administrators would not allow them to perform "Rent: School Edition," which is based on Jonathan Larson’s Broadway hit about a group of young struggling artists and musicians coping with poverty, AIDS and drug addiction. Some of the characters are openly gay.

The school edition omits one of the original songs, eliminates some of the coarse language and tones down some of the displays of affection.

“Unfortunately, this musical seems to be too controversial for some, and I understand the apprehension towards its approval,” Plainfield Central junior Thomas Rietz said. “But this musical will help enrich the curriculum.

“It’s explorations of the truths like these that enrich us as people and allow us to make the right choices,” he said. “Simply put, learning from others' mistakes is very important.”

Rietz said freshmen students are taught in health class about sex, drugs and making good choices. Exploring these topics through art will reinforce what students are taught in school, he said.

Many high school students have already been exposed through various media to the same messages in “Rent,” including sex, STDs and drug use, Rietz added.

“It conveys messages of love, equality and embracing the life you have,” Plainfield Central junior Betsy Lugo said. “It helped me learn the realities of our imperfect world. It exemplifies how the world is and the harsh realities it brings.”

Student Alexandra Smith said “Rent” promotes an anti-bullying message that the district also emphasizes.

Smith said many novels students read for class and many previous performances have had controversial content.

For instance, she said, last spring’s show, “How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying,” featured sexual innuendos, drunkenness and extramarital affairs. “West Side Story” features a rape scene and “Grease” shows teenage pregnancy, drinking and smoking.

Lugo added that the school’s male cheerleaders who dress like women and perform explicit dance moves are laughed at, but there may be students at Plainfield Central who have a gender identity disorder, and their problems cannot be discussed.

“Let us show our message of love and prove our maturity,” she said.

Sign up for the Plainfield Patch newsletter.

Superintendent John Harper said he was unaware until this weekend that the students were planning to perform “Rent” or that building principals rejected the play based on inappropriate content.

But he and school board President Roger Bonuchi said that they stand by the decisions made by Principal Robert Smith, Assistant Principal Mary Boyd and other staff that the play is inappropriate for the school.

Neither Smith nor Boyd responded to email or voicemail messages left by Patch.

Harper said the district does not discriminate against sexual orientation or deny alcohol or drug use. The district is also not trying to hide from the “realities of the community, state and world,” he said.

“We typically shine lights on problems,” he said.

But some of the lyrics, which include lines such as “I’m like a cat in heat,” or “I didn’t notice you without the handcuffs,” were inappropriate for high school students, Harper said.

Many of the themes, including being anti-middle class or anti-authority, were also among the reasons cited to deny the play.

He said the play was rejected as a matter of appropriateness, and the building principals know the school best.

“I respect and appreciate not only your opinions, but the integrity it took to voice those opinions to the board of education,” Harper told the students.

Rietz said after the meeting that he is disappointed, but was happy to share his opinions on the show.

He hopes to meet with Central's principals and continue the conversation “responsibly and respectfully," he said.

-----------------------

Follow Plainfield Patch on Facebook.

Kevin Griffin October 10, 2012 at 10:39 pm
What exactly in the play Rent do you think high school students shouldn't be aware of?
This is not an 8th grade performance. Everything in the original version (which this is a watered down version on) are things kids deal with and you are clueless if you think otherwise.
Yoloxochitl Adame October 10, 2012 at 11:29 pm
I am absolutely stunned. Is this 2012....the same year that the president of our nation openly supported gay marriage? I agree 100% with all who say this play MUST go on. 202 has an opportunity to take a much needed progressive step toward supporting the kind of positive messages that are critical for our society, especially our younger generations, to hear. The gay community has come such a long way in terms of achieving the right to be recognized as the beautiful community it is and by not allowing this play to go on, administrators will put one more barrier back on the road. PLEASE, 202, DO NOT SEND THE MESSAGE TO OUR GAY SONS AND DAUGHTERS THAT IT'S "INAPPROPRIATE" TO BE WHO YOU ARE, because that is EXACTLY the message this decision sends.
Mom of 5 October 10, 2012 at 11:46 pm
I couldn't disagree more with the decision to "shield" our students from what could be an awesome, educational experience. The Plainfield School District has accomplished some amazing things in regard to educating our community about the issues that matter most to us as parents (eg. recently hosting guest speakers to address the issue of heroin addiction), which is why I am so baffled as to why administrators would back peddle like this. Any parent who has any idea about what their sons and daughters are exposed to in this day and age would have no problem with this play being put on.....if you, as a parent, have not seen what your "child" has access to on the internet and what goes on with their facebook page ( and I mean their REAL facebook page, the one with their AKA name and their real list of contacts that they think you don't know about), then you need to get in touch with their reality. Watching a production of RENT is mild in comparison to what our students are exposed to 24/7 by way of the phones we all bought for each of them. They're smart kids and ones that need to hear these issues openly discussed and what better way than watching it on stage, in the company of their parent for a change.
pchs student October 10, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Zaney, this is what J Hill believes. She has just as much of a right to express their thoughts as you do in the comments below. You don't need to tell her to grow up just because she doesn't agree. It's ok that you guys disagree, and I commend you also for stating your opinions as well.
Dave October 11, 2012 at 01:50 am
Have to agree with Jill H and the board on this one. Saw it ON Broadway with the original cast. Great music, ...more than just a sad story with a tragic outcome. It was downright disturbing, to say the least. Liberalism (Obama says it's o.k.) doesn't make it "right". Living in high risk lifestyles illustrated in this musical needs to be talked about, not from a judgmental point of view, but a practical reality. Look up the stats on life expectancy for drug users and the LBGT community at large. Is it o.k. to let people die from things that are preventable? Where do you stop? Why not just let every teen experiment with alcohol, ...that's a reality in this world, isn't it? And, if that's o.k., then why not grass? And, then just do one line, ...after all that's the world we live in. There's a fine line between being supportive of those we love and condoning activities that cause early death.
Mom of 5 October 11, 2012 at 01:52 am
Um Dave, "too much tolerance leads to destruction"? What kind of tolerance are you speaking of? I'm curious to know. Is it the same kind of "tolerance" that caused a certain republican president to "draw a line in the sand" and start a trillion dollar war? You say your comment has no religious implications yet you speak of good and evil? Come on, I hope the citizens of Plainfield are a lot smarter than to fall for your subliminal message. Here's a quote from a not so famous person, "Open up YOUR eyes" and remember that there are a lot of young, impressionable people out there reading these comments who don't need to be infected with this kind of political and religious propoganda, with all due respect.
P-Ville Lifer October 11, 2012 at 09:12 am
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks the male cheerleaders are disgusting; I think that should be done away with more then this play. I didn't like them when I was in high school; I found them to be degrading towards women but yet the tradition goes on year after year.
If the school district is SO worried about the kids; why isn't this tradition stopped? What about the kids who may be struggling with transgender issues; this just enforces the belief that guys who dress up like ladies should be laughed at and ridiculed.
Tammy October 11, 2012 at 11:01 am
Dave, your comment actually supports the high school's production of RENT. RENT does not glorify high risk lifestyles. It shows the harsh reality and tragic outcomes of these lifestyles. Have you seen Grease? That actually encourages kids to smoke, drink and cave in to peer pressure. RENT does quite the opposite.
P-Ville Lifer October 11, 2012 at 11:07 am
I left one reply about the male cheerleaders being allowed but obviously censorship is also alive and well on the Patch. Basically I think we should get rid of them.
Kevin Griffin October 11, 2012 at 11:23 am
You speak of realities yet you live in the world of make believe.
- 75% of high schoolers regularly drink alcohol. - 25% smoke weed daily (no one has called it grass since the 70s) - 15% abuse prescription drugs (more deadly then illegal drugs by far) - PCHS has had to have forums regarding the exploding heroin epidemic they are dealing with (the exact drug dealt with in Rent) - More straight people contract HIV/AIDs then gay people. - Being born LGBT does not lower your life expectancy Sticking your head in the sand and pretending there is not a problem does not make it true Dave. Your ignorance of facts, and intolerance of the LGBT community is disgusting. You claim you are not speaking from a judgmental point of view then you go one to lump in all LGBT people with risky behaviour and drug addiction? People are born the way they are born, it is not preventable no matter what your religious zealots seem to think.
John Roberts October 11, 2012 at 12:14 pm
Have to agree with Zaney on this one..And after the kids get done reading the books they do not want to.They are asked their opinion on it and then graded on that opinion..not facts but opinions..This to me is ReEducation directed so that everyone has the same opinion to think the same way..my kid got into a hot debat with her teacher at Joliet Central that just happened to bring up the right to bare arms and what the kids thought about it...Just out of the blue while the kids were working on their papers...My kid said the teacher talked and acted like that's what she was supposed to do is bring it up and make it sound so bad that the kids all wanted to go against it..Then when my kid started talking about it..the teacher got pissed,because restless like what she was planing wasn't working.said she got red faced and the kids agreed with my daughter the more the teacher became unsettled...So my kid asked outright...Is the government making you discuss the right to bare arms as part of your job.And is the government making you make it sound like a bad idea to bare arms...Teachers reply. " That's none of your business " ......Censorship...is a reeducation process just like the soldiers do to the terrorists in prison camps..Reeducating them to think they way the government wants them to think....Let the kids see how the real world is and let them decide what they want to take part in and not take part in.
Tim October 11, 2012 at 12:38 pm
You should probably take a lok at the books that English students HAVE to read.
The Scarlet Letter Huckleberry Finn The Great Gatsby etc... The current required reading for these students meets all of your criteria, so are you saying these books should be banned as well? Instead, lets allow the freedom to learn, so that todays children don't grow up to be like you, and find censorship in any form to be acceptable.
Kevin Griffin October 11, 2012 at 12:39 pm
@P-ville Lifer your comment about the cheerleaders is down below
A October 11, 2012 at 03:08 pm
The Broadway is different than the School Edition, darling. But don't worry your pretty, pure head -- our corrupt system will take care of you and all the other conservatives.
OpenMinded October 11, 2012 at 03:20 pm
I guess in it's place, PCHS should put on a Barney Revue or one of the Sesame Street stage shows. I hear Elmo does a PHENOMENAL job with counting.
J Hill October 11, 2012 at 03:58 pm
To zaney, No need to tell me to grow up... I am a grown up who has an opinion and it certainly does not match yours. You know...that's okay! If you want to post a comment no need to be so sarcastic. I know how the world is, I have been around for awhile. I am also one to say thank you to others (the board) when I see that they have made a good coice. It is okay for me to agree as it is for you to diasgree. Would be nice if people were a little more kinder to each other. No I am not living in rosey land, I also don't think we have to continually shove the insults of the world down our kids throats. I am not bashing you or your opinion, maybe you should pause before bashing on others. Have a nice day.
Kevin Griffin October 11, 2012 at 04:35 pm
J Hill, you say the world would be better if people were kinder towards each other...how ironic. You make a statement about how discriminating against the LGBT community is good because this country has shown a lack of values and morals lately, and then complain when you are told to grow up and stop being a bigot. Maybe you should practice what you preach and actually make this world a better place, not just one that is perfect for the religious minority who wish to impose their false values upon us all.
You can call it just opinions all you want, but your opinions are dangerous and lead to hate and violence. Where most of us come from values and morals mean respecting your fellow man - all of them - and not discriminating against anyone regardless of their color, their sex, or the sexual orientation they were born with.
Tim October 11, 2012 at 04:43 pm
Right.
Nobody should disrespect you by telling you what to think or read. But you have no problem supporting others who DO tell people what to think and read. Perhaps a basic level logic course would do you some good.
J Hill October 11, 2012 at 05:59 pm
Kevin, you do not know me and if you did you would most certainly know that I am not a bigot and I do care & repsect my fellow man. You certainly do not know my stance in religion/faith. My thankful comment was directed to the board, for a choice that I felt was right. You are not required to agree with it. I repsect others,and this is how I feel we all should to be treated...with respect. That does not mean you need to agree with me, but it does mean to be kind & respectful to others, regardless of your agreement/disagreement with their opinoins. I NEVER was being disrespectful to anyone, as you stated. No need to call me names or create a bigger topic to talk about.
Tim October 11, 2012 at 06:18 pm
You certainly get upset when people treat you with exactly the same attitude you feel is 'right' for others to be treated with.
Logic... learn it!
Rachel Martinez October 11, 2012 at 09:38 pm
As, I student at Plainfield Central, I see what goes on in the school every day. If students were going to try drugs/alcohol, they would have done it already. This play does NOT promote drug usage, it simply includes it in the script. I hear more drug references in the hallway on my way to first period alone than I have read in this entire script. Moreover, to say that the LGBT community has a shorter life expectancy is rash at best and completely ignorant at worst. Yes, suicide among LGBT teens has become far too common in today's society. Through performing RENT: School Edition we hope that we can create an environment of acceptance for students in our own school, we have an opportunity to prevent the unspeakable tragedy of another young life lost to suicide. Again, by performing this show we are not encouraging drug or alcohol usage whatsoever, and we are NOT condoning those activities.
Reader October 12, 2012 at 02:27 am
I appreciate those of you who support this production for its message of tolerance. If only you could be more tolerant of those whose opinions differ from your own
karen cable October 12, 2012 at 03:32 am
I agree that the show should go on. Read the facebook page. See it from the student's point of view. They are more adult about this topic than some of the adults here in this forum. I think a lot could be learned from them.
J Hill: Don't judge the high school edition by what you have seen off broadway. You should not judge it unless you have seen the version they wish to present. Isn't that being unfair? Tim: You ask if pchs has turned catholic...Even private colleges will put on this production. It says something when a private institution will allow it a a public one won't. Its sad that this has happened this day in age. Bottom line: We need to respect our kids and what they are going through in their lives. There is a post in particular by Keegan Bosch on the facebook page that is a must read for everyone to understand where these young adults are coming from. I believe with all my heart that this production would open eyes in a positive way and would not be detrimental as some would wrongly believe. BRING BACK THE PRODUCTION!!! The students and the community deserve it. Let's stop living in the past and practice what we preach...tolerance and acceptance.
Hale Landes October 13, 2012 at 10:49 am
I think that the school district is sadly misguided in their decision. The students should find another venue in which they can put on this production. The show must go on.
Holli Carey Long October 13, 2012 at 11:47 am
Rachel, I thought your comment was very well said. I just shared the article on my FB page and qouted your statement about wanting to create an environment of acceptance. I commend you and your fellow PCHS students for working for tolerance. I think we can all learn from you!
Haiku October 13, 2012 at 12:13 pm
J Hill, I hope that
the irony of this post isn't lost on you.
Hurtin Anfrustrated October 15, 2012 at 06:19 pm
There are PLENTY of plays that are much more appropriate for our HS and might I add, much more entertaining. Wait until you get to College to explore your rights as an 18 and older Actor/Artist.
Tim October 15, 2012 at 06:49 pm
You would fit right in with the Iran government.
Meanwhile, rational people know that rights are not restricted by age, only responsibilities are. Otherwise, these kids would still be working full time in the farm fields at the age of 11. They don't need rights until they are 18 according to you, right? It is sad that there are still people that do not know the difference between rights, and responsibilities.
J Hill October 16, 2012 at 05:34 pm
Good point about rights & responsibilities, however Tim I think you stated them backwards. Rational people do know that some rights are indeed restricted by age (right to drive a car, vote, & drink). It is the responsibility that is not goverened by age, but by experience. You are correct in some rights...we have the right to fill our bodies with fast food 7 days per week but how responsible would that be? The same could be said for what we read, watch on tv/movies etc. If we choose to fill our heads with negative material, then how can we be surprised by the desensatization of what our world is becoming. This open forum can be a great tool for all to see each other's points, if statements are respectful, authentic, & not derogatory.
Tim October 16, 2012 at 05:45 pm
Those are privileges, not rights. With privileges come responsibilities. It is disheartening to think that you think driving is a 'right'.
The right to a fair trial. The right to not be discriminated against. The right to not be a slave. We even have 10 of them that we usually refer to 'the bill of rights'. They are not called the bill of responsibilities. You are the one confusing the two. Violent movies do not make people become violent, any more than sexual movies make someone a prostitute. The question still stands, which books will you be demanding the school district ban? Huckleberry Finn The Scarlet Letter A Farewell to Arms All of these books meet your definition for banning this play, so why are you not vocalizing your displeasure that students are FORCED to read these books? This play, after all, is a choice not only for the participants but for the audience as well. Nobody is forcing you to watch it, or anyone else for that matter. Why is it so important to you to take away the choices of otherwise free people?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Plainfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
SouthSide June 18, 2013 at 04:19 pm
Poor Turtle. I'm doing my part by sharing this poster. Best wishes, and prayers...
Ashley June 18, 2013 at 10:11 pm
Thank you!
The 12U Raiders has great week at Cooperstown, New York.
Nicki Anderson June 17, 2013 at 10:26 pm
What a fantastic week we had! We are very proud of you boys! You played great! The Anderson's
Mike Keniley June 17, 2013 at 12:18 pm
I am just wondering how long this suspense filled soap opera will continue? Bottom line: HurtadoRead More knew his buddy needed a job...so; he and his majority board members made a mockery of local government due process and gave Mr. Peck a job, even though Hurtado voted with the past board to unanimously select an Exec…who is still under a contract. And then decided there was a need to pay a board secretary (who jumped out of the frying pan…smart move) and then appointed someone without pay. And of course there is a need to have a paid political hack to help publicly spin the board’s craziness via press releases.
AlaskaDreaming June 17, 2013 at 12:22 pm
I hate to ask the obvious of Mr. Peck (not that I expect him to answer anyway), but why is thisRead More announcement coming from the Executive Director rather than our newly appointed Director of Communications?
Bad News Bears June 18, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Mr. Peck, please answer 2 questions for me: 1. If you are cutting $800K but AdministrativeRead More Salaries are up over $118K, where are the cuts coming from. I have always been a patron of the Park District and want to know which of my programs your skimming off to pay yourself and Mr. Booth. 2. "Our staff deserves a lot of credit for this budget,” Peck said, “as their efforts to hold the line wherever possible have led to our success on behalf of District residents." Is reducing hours of employees the way you reward your staff now? I'm very upset that you honestly thought that cutting loyal employees hours instead of offering benefits was a good idea. I have a better one, cut the hours of Mr. Booth who has an unnecessary job and use his pay and salaries to offset the 4 loyal part-time workers. I will not hold my breath for your answers since answering questions to the people who pay your salary isn't on your to do list