Some Plainfield High School - Central Campus students are speaking out after an administrative decision put an end to plans to stage a reworked version of “Rent.”
Senior Topher Otake, 17, said students learned Thursday that school administrators would not allow a production of “Rent: School Edition” to move forward for the spring 2013 musical.
Want Plainfield news delivered free to your inbox? Sign up for the Plainfield Patch newsletter.
The show is based on Jonathan Larson’s Broadway hit — itself modeled after the opera "La Boheme" — about a group of struggling artists coping with poverty, AIDS and drug addiction.
Plainfield Central Principal Robert Smith did not return a message left by Patch, but District 202 Community Relations Director Tom Hernandez said administrators made the decision that the play “is inappropriate, based on some of its content.”
Otake said he believes the decision stems from the show’s focus on several main characters who are gay.
“The musical has had its many controversial topics watered down so that it could be rendered appropriate for high school students,” he said. “ … Whether they want to say it or not, that’s the message they are conveying.”
Otake, who is gay, called the decision “hypocritical” given the school district’s focus on themes like tolerance and acceptance.
But administrators cited other reasons for the decision.
“The [high school] version is indeed ‘reworked,’ but after reading the entire script some elements were still considered inappropriate,” Hernandez said Friday in an email. “For example: the show gets into drug use, disrespect for the law and sexual promiscuity, among other topics. While some of the profanity is toned down from the ‘official’ version, the rest of the script still caused significant enough concern to make this decision, which was not done lightly.”
PCHS senior Kayleen Brady said the high school version tones down the displays of affection between characters and does not explicitly portray drug use.
“There’s literally one drug reference and it’s the word ‘stash’ in a song,” she said, adding past PCHS performances have included sexual innuendo, and, in the case of "West Side Story," an attempted rape scene.
She also cited last spring’s “How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying,” which featured a character who has an affair with a married man.
“In the past, we certainly covered all these issues,” Brady said. “There are a lot of sexual innuendoes in [‘How to Succeed’], but they’re all heterosexual, so we didn’t have to worry about it.”
Brady said she and other members of the PCHS theater community feel the district is sending an anti-homosexual message.
“It sends the message to us that homosexuality is wrong,” she said. “Even those of use who are not homosexual are deeply offended.”
Senior Teresa Bates said students were excited after director Alanna Frederiksen, who also serves as the school’s choir director, introduced the play to them at the start of the school year.
“As Ms. Frederiksen started talking to us about it, we really started seeing the meaning behind it,” she said, adding she believes “Rent” shares a message of acceptance.
“This is good for us and kids in our school,” she said.
“ … One parent said, ‘This is not a Girl Scout play,’” Bates added. “Yes, but neither was ‘West Side Story' when we did it."
Otake said he realizes the topic of homosexuality is a loaded one.
“It’s such a touchy subject, especially with the election coming up,” he said. “It was really exciting to have a show we could really sink our teeth into,” he added.
Another student, who asked that his name not be used, said he wasn’t surprised by the administration’s decision.
“I can’t say I wasn’t expecting it,” he said, adding that as an aspiring actor, he was hoping the show would be a learning experience. “I was just more or less disappointed.”
Otake said students have been emailing PCHS administrators to make a case for allowing the production of “Rent” to proceed.
Frederiksen, who was to direct the play, did not respond to a message from Patch on Friday.
Facebook page draws support
Hours after learning of the administration’s decision on Oct. 4, Otake said he launched a Facebook group to raise awareness of students’ efforts to get make the play happen.
Titled “Save Rent: School Edition, Save PCHS Arts,” the group quickly gained hundreds of members.
“I started it at 8:30 and invited 80 people,” Otake said. “I checked back 20 minutes later and there were 400 people.” By the end of the night, the number had climbed to 1,300 members.
As of Sunday night, there were more than 1,700.
“I was not expecting that many people,” Otake said. “People started sharing it with their friends and families and it started sort of a chain reaction.”
“I think it shows that people care, and that’s what’s important,” Bates said.
‘Rent’ in high schools
Plainfield Central wouldn’t be the first high school to stage the “school” version of the play, which was first made available in 2007.
The website for theater licensing company Music Theatre International offers a description of the school edition: “This adaptation has been carefully done, working with the Larson estate to retain the dramatic intent of the groundbreaking rock musical, and consists of minimal changes to language and the removal of one song ... to make it possible for many schools to perform this piece.”
In 2009, a judge ruled that students in a Nevada high school could proceed with staging not only “Rent,” but also “The Laramie Project,” which deals with the murder of gay college student Matthew Shepard.
Last March, students in Massachusetts successfully lobbied the school board for permission to perform the school version of “Rent.”
What do you think? Should Plainfield Central students be allowed to perform a version of ‘Rent’? Tell us what you think in the comments.
----------------------
Follow us on Facebook for a slightly different take on the news.
It's a PLAY. You do know that no actual drugs are being used, right?. Just like when they performed 'West Side Story' the actors weren't really trying to rape the girl. Just like in 'how to succeed in business without really trying', the actors weren't really having an affair with a married person. It sounds like the adults opposed to this have a poorer grasp on discerning fantasy from reality, than these young adults do. Should these adults really be in a position of authority if they can't grasp such a basic concept? I'm proud of the students, and embarrassed with the administrators(again).
Now, if the Wizard of Oz were on the marquee we would put it on our list of things to do this spring. I can't say that we will be patronizing the play, but I don't agree with the district for censoring it. We will just make an informed decision not to attend based on the adult content much too mature for my 6 and 9 year olds that would be joining us. I don't see this as any different than choosing to watching a movie based on it's PG rating. Give me a choice and I will make it for MY family. That said, if
Read Page 43. I'm not saying I agree with the decision, and I'm not saying that it's right, I'm just saying that I understand. And that's all I'm going to say about that.
Also La Cage Aux Folles is AWESOME
Stay classy D202 administration!
You can leave the group Mystery Women. Just in case you didn't know. Click on the star looking thingy and click leave group.
Good grief. Look at the high school staple "Grease." A "good girl" gets mocked and teased for "being good," by a girl gang of which one of the members fears she is pregnant (interpretation: that means she had sex). Then, in order to be accepted, the good girl begins to smoke, and dress and act like the rest of the Pink Ladies (presumably going to have sex, too) and, VOILA! She's accepted with open arms. And gets the boy. What kind of message does THAT send? Yet it is continually performed in high schools without much of a peep.
1 Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."
http://plainfield.patch.com/articles/banned-books-week-what-you-need-to-know-bdd0c01d Notice, that the censorship of this play happened during the 'National Banned Books Week', to raise awareness of censorship in schools. The lack of education by our 'educators' is laughable.
I guess this push for absolute control over the issues of what people talk about, give them some consolation about not having done anything to address the real-life situation going on right under their noses. Part of addressing the problem, is being able to face the issue out in the open, and not pretend that not talking about it will make it go away. Like has been said, this says more about the administrators making these 'decisions', than it says about the content of any censored play. Understandable, but sad.